期刊文献+

中西哲学比较视角下的关系范畴探析 被引量:2

A Study on the Category of “Relationship” from the Perspective of Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从哲学的视角考察"关系"范畴,能够展现这一范畴的多方面意义。在本体论意义上,"关系"作为"实体"的组成部分,其存在具有相对独立性,是"实体"存在的隐性前提。在认识论意义上,"关系"是在过程中认识事物的关键环节,中国哲学范畴"象"展现了通过"关系同构"把握事物本质特征的途径,"关系"辨识能够成为直觉认知的思维工具。合理调整事物之间的关系具有重要的方法论价值,而"道"展现了事物之间关系和谐的理想状态。探讨"关系"的哲学意义,有助于深入了解西方现代哲学与中国传统哲学之间的内在联系,消除由于文化差异对"关系"范畴的误解,促进不同文化之间的交流。 Studying the category of" relationship" from the perspective of philosophy will reveal its multiple significances. In the sense of ontology," relationship" is a constituent of substance. Its existence is relatively independent and is the tacit prerequisite of the existence of substance. In the sense of epistemology," relationship"is the key link in the process of understanding things. Traditional Chinese category of Xiang shows a way to grasp the essential features of things by means of" co-formation of relationship", so that identification of" relationship"will be the instrument of intuitive cognition. Reasonable adjustment of relationships among things bears significant methodological values while Dao reveals the ideal state of the harmonious relationship between things.Examination of the philosophical significance of" relationship" will help further our understanding of the intrinsic connection between modern western and traditional Chinese philosophy and eliminate the misunderstanding of"relationship" caused by cultural differences so as to promote the communication between different cultures.
作者 王前
出处 《哲学分析》 CSSCI 2018年第1期94-104,197-198,共11页 Philosophical Analysis
关键词 关系 实体 直觉 relationship substance Xiang intuition Dao
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1亚里士多德 苗力田(译).《尼各马科伦理学》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1990.118.
  • 2Αρστοτλε,1926,Αρστοτλου Ηθικων Νικομαχειων, with an English translation by H. Rackham, Harvard University Press.
  • 3Aristotle, 1925 ,The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle, trans. Sir David Ross, Oxford University Press.
  • 42000, Nicomachean Ethics, ed. R. Crisp, Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Burnyeat, M. F., 1954, "Aristotle: On Learning to Be Good", in T. Honderich ed., Philosophy Through Its Past, Penguin Books.
  • 6Cooper, John M., 1975, Reason and Human Good in Aristotle, Harvard University Press.
  • 7Fortenbaugh, W. W. , 1975, Aristotle on Emotion, Duckworth.
  • 8Heraclitus, 1957, Fragments: A Text and Translation with a Commentary, by T. M. Robinson, University of Toronto Press.
  • 9Hughes, Gerard J, 2001, Aristotle on Ethics, Routledge.
  • 10Hume, David, 2000, A Treatise of Human Nature, David Fate Norton & May J. Norton eds. , Oxford University Press.

共引文献44

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部