期刊文献+

浅析国际领土争端中的证据提交和排除规则

Analysis on Evidence Submission and Exclusion Rules in Territorial Disputes Resolution Procedure of the ICJ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在以往解决国际领土争端的司法实践中,国际法院始终坚持当事方提供证据自由的原则,由此导致当事方提交的多为利己证据,使国际法院对事实的全面认定存在局限性。因此在分析证据可采性之前,如何最大程度的获取相关证据,是国际法院审判任务的关键因素。同时,为了避免证据的过度提交导致审判程序冗长,国际法院也形成了一系列对证据予以限制的规则。 In the judicial practice of resolving international territorial disputes,the International Court of Justice has always adhered to the principle of freedom of evidence by the parties,which led to the parties to submit evidence in their advantage. As a result,there are limitations in identifying facts for the ICJ. Before considering the admissibility of evidence,the key to the trial process is how to obtain evidence to the utmost. Simultaneously,to avoid the lengthy procedure caused by the redundant submission of evidence,the ICJ has also formed a series of rule to Exclude evidence.
作者 纪茗珠
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2018年第2期83-85,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词 领土争端 证据规则 国际法院 territorial disputes, rules of evidence,ICJ
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1国际法院在1969年联邦德国诉丹麦和荷兰的"北海大陆架案"中认为,"没有任何规则要求一个国家的陆地边界必须是完全划定的.通常,在很多地方和很长时间内并不是这样的".1969 I.C.J.3,32,para.46,20Fen.1969.(全文中有关I.C.J.的文件均可在其官方网站中查阅:http://www.icj-cij/org)
  • 21996年的一份研究显示,从1950年到1990年共40年时间内,世界上出现的陆地边界争议多达129个;而有关的海域边界争议则更多,全世界估计有260处存在海域边界的争议.参见Cerald H.Blake, The Resolution of International Boundary Disputes, in Institute of Petroleum, Dispute Resolution in the International Oil and Gas Industries, 1990, p. 125,127. 转引自Jan Paulsson, "Boundary Disputes into the Twentity- first Century, Why, How and Who?" American Society ofInternational Law, Proceedings of the 95th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. ,Apill 4 - 7,2001, p. 123.
  • 3Surya P. Sharma, Territorial Acquisition, Disputes andInternational Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1997, p.29.
  • 4毛振发."当代世界的边界争端探源"[J].世界经济与政治,1995,(3):38-38.
  • 5Land and Maritime Boundary Between Cameroon and Nigeria(Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening), I.C.J., Judgment of 10 October 2002.
  • 6Case Concerning Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), I.C.J., Judgment of 17 December 2002.
  • 7Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway), I.C.J., 1951,p.116.
  • 8Edith Brown Weiss, et. al., "Symposium: The ILC' s StateResponsibility Articles: Invoking State Responsibility in the Twenty - firstCentury", American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, October 2002,pp. 807 - 808.
  • 91933年由15个拉丁美洲国家和美国参加的第七届"美洲国家国际会议"通过了<国家权利和义务公约>(又被称为<蒙得维的亚公约>).该公约规定国家必须具有确定的领土(a defined territory),并且认为这个要求是国际习惯法规则的宣示.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部