摘要
实践表明,近年来股东知情权诉讼不断增加,股东与公司之间的利益冲突问题日益严重,2017年8月底刚刚出台的《公司法司法解释(四)》对股东知情权诉讼做出了大篇幅规定,以期指导司法实践。本文对上海市2016年度股东知情权的案例进行检索梳理,提炼出股东知情权诉讼的争议焦点,分析现行法规存在的不足,并结合美国和日本法律的立法比较,在《解释四》的基础上,提出相关制度的完善建议,以实现股东利益和公司利益的平衡。
In recent years, practice shows that the litigation right of minority shareholders increasing conflicts of interests between the shareholders and the company is becoming more and more serious, the end of August this year has just introduced the "company law judicial interpretation(four)" on the litigation of shareholders' right to know make up a large part of the provisions, in order to guide the judicial practice. The Shanghai 2016 annual shareholders' right to know the case retrieval sort, extract the focus of controversy litigation right of minority shareholders, analysis of deficiencies of the existing laws and regulations exist, and combined with the United States and Japan law legislation comparison, in the "four" on the basis of explanation, put forward relevant suggestions to improve the system, to achieve the interests of shareholders and the balance of the interests of the company.
出处
《吉林金融研究》
2018年第1期67-74,78,共9页
Journal of Jilin Financial Research
关键词
股东知情权
实证分析
公司法司法解释四
Right to Know the Shareholders
An Empirical Analysis
Judicial Interpretation of the Company Law Four