期刊文献+

烈度仪用于地震预警的可靠性研究——以高雄M_S6.8地震为例 被引量:7

Reliability of seismic intensity instrument used in earthquake early warning:Taking the Gaoxiong M_S6.8 earthquake as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2016年2月6日我国台湾高雄MS6.8地震中烈度仪观测网的实际记录为研究对象,通过对烈度仪台站的震相捡拾结果精度、峰值地震动衰减关系适用性、预警震级计算结果准确性等3方面的对比分析,研究了烈度仪用于地震预警时的优势和可靠性,并讨论了可能存在的问题和风险.研究结果表明:对于震中附近具有较高信噪比的烈度仪台站,采用现有震相捡拾方法即可获得较准确的震相到时信息;现有的地震动衰减关系并不完全适用于烈度仪台网,直接应用这些关系式时存在一定风险;基于密集布设的烈度仪观测台网,在较短时间即可获取大量信息,采用已有预警震级估算方法的计算结果有较高的准确性. Based on the seismic intensity instrument(SSI)records of Gaoxiong MS6.8 earthquake in Taiwan,China which occurred on February 6,2016,we studied the advantage and reliability of SSI used in earthquake early warning(EEW)through the analysis on precision of phase pick,applicability of peak ground motion attenuation relationships and accuracy of earthquake magnitude estimation results.Meanwhile,we also discussed shortcuts and risks of using SSI during the EEW process.The results showed that for SSI stations with near-epicenter and high signal to noise ratio(SNR),the existing phase pick methods are applicable to obtain accurate P phase arrival time.The existing peak ground motion attenuation laws may not fully apply to SSI stations,and a certain risk exists when apply them to SSI station directly.As a result of dense SSI stations layout,agreat quantity of useful information may be acquired in a short time,which is very favorable for earthquake magnitude estimation during the EEW process,and magnitude estimation results could have a good accuracy by using existing methods.
出处 《地震学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期955-964,共10页 Acta Seismologica Sinica
基金 中国地震局地震科技星火计划(XH16020Y)资助
关键词 烈度仪 震相捡拾 地震动衰减 震级 seismic intensity instrument phase pick ground motion attenuation magnitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献63

  • 1金星,马强,李山有,杨文东.宽频带强震仪与地震仪同一台基上记录仿真对比研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(5):7-12. 被引量:16
  • 2金星,马强,李山有.利用数字强震仪记录实时仿真地动位移[J].地震学报,2005,27(1):79-85. 被引量:27
  • 3王继,陈九辉,刘启元,李顺成,郭飚.流动地震台阵观测初至震相的自动检测[J].地震学报,2006,28(1):42-51. 被引量:44
  • 4Allen R M, Kanamori H. 2003. The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California[J]. Science, 300: 786-789.
  • 5Allen R M, Brown H, Hellweg M, Kireev A, Neuhauser D. 2007. Real-time test of the ElarmS earthquake earlywarning methodology[J]. JGeophysRes, 112(B08311), doi:10.1029/2008GL036366.
  • 6Ellsworth W 1., Beroza G C. 1995. Seismic evidence for an earthquake nucleation phase[J]. Science, 268:851- 855.
  • 7Ellsworth W I., Heaton T. 1994. Real time analysis of earthquakes: Early warning systems and rapid damage assessment[J]. Sensor.v, (April): 27- 33.
  • 8Erdik M, Fahjan Y, OzelO, Alcik H, Mert A, GulM. 2003. lstanbulearthquake rapid response and thetarly warning system[J]. Bull Earthq Eng, 1(1) : 157-163.
  • 9Hsiao N C, Wu Y M, Shin T C, Li Z, Teng T L. 2009. Development of an earthquake early warning system in Taiwan[J]. GeophysRes Lett, 36: L00BO2, doi:10.1029/2008 Gh036596.
  • 10Iannaeeone G, Zollo A, Elia L. 2010. A prototype system for earthquake early warning and alert management in somhern Italy[J]. BullEarthqEng, 8(5): 1105-1129.

共引文献134

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部