摘要
清河郡本《纬书》含有大量不见于其他纬书辑本的独有佚文,学界对其文献学价值多予以肯定。然此本来源不明,存在伪作的可能。清河郡本《易纬·通卦验》是该本《易纬》书中保存独有佚文数量最多的一种,通过文献梳理、比勘及内容、语词等方面的考察,可以发现清河郡本《易纬·通卦验》佚文多有矫揉造作的痕迹,应为后人根据已有文献伪造而成,在使用这些佚文时应加以甄别。
The Qinghejun version of Wei Shu(Apocryphal Texts)collected many anonymous texts which other collections of apocrypha do not have,and the academic circle gives it great credit for its bibliographical value.However,this book came from an unknown source and is probably apseudograph.The Qinghejun version of the Yiwei tongguayanis such a book that preserves the most anonymous texts in the various versions of Yiwei(Apocrypha of the Changes).Through the sorting out of and collation of the texts as well as comparison of certain contents and terms,it can be concluded that the so-called lost texts in the Qinghejun redaction have many traces of forgery,which ought to be a result from later scholars' writings based on extant literature.When using it,therefore,scholars should distinguish the false.
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
2017年第6期86-94,共9页
Studies of Zhouyi
关键词
《易纬》
《通卦验》
清河郡本
纬书
辨伪
Yiwei
tongguayan
Qinghejun version
apocrypha
discrimination