医疗损害鉴定制度判例实证研究——以203份判例为对象

Medical damage Appraisal System Case Study :Take the 203 Precedents as the Object

医疗损害纠纷案件因其专业性往往要开展医疗损害鉴定。本文应用实证判例分析方法,调查中国裁判文书网公布的2016年度上海市第一人民法院、南京、杭州、广州、合肥中级人民法院共203份医疗损纠纷害案件的民事判决书,研究医疗损害鉴定的概况,得出实践中法官和当事人鉴定依赖的现象,未遵循"同行鉴定"的原则,法官采信鉴定意见存在的不足,调解率低等问题。对此提供完善我国医疗损害鉴定制度的建议,以及借鉴邻国日本经验,提高目前我国法官对鉴定意见审查能力的可行性措施。

Medical malpractice cases often require medical malpractice identification because of their professionalism. Applied empirical case analysis method, this paper gave a survey on the a total of 203 cases of medical disputes and loss of civil judgment released Chinese referee network 2016 annual Shanghai City People＇s Court of the first court, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Hefei intermediate people＇s court, and analyzed the medical damage appraisal situation. Through that, it is found that the judges and the parties in practice in the presence of identification depend on the situation; it is insufficient to only pay attention to the autopsy report and other problems, such as the obedience to the ＂peer review＂ principle, the acceptance of shortcomings of expert opinion, as well as the low rate of mediation. In this regard, the author puts forward the concept of perfecting the medical damage identification system in China, and draws on the experience of neighboring countries and puts forward feasible measures to improve the ability of judges to review the opinions of our country.