期刊文献+

临时跨关节外固定联合延期接骨板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅤ~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折效果分析 被引量:5

Effect of temporary inter-articular external fixation and posterior plate fixation on Schatzker Ⅴ-Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:SchatzkerⅤ~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的骨折类型复杂且关节面受损严重,目前治疗方法对创伤部位周围软组织保护不足,患者预后多较差。目的:研究临时跨关节外固定联合延期接骨板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅤ~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的效果。方法:收集2014年6月至2016年6月我院骨科收治的67例SchatzkerⅤ~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折患者临床资料。根据患者治疗方式不同分外固定组(n=34)和跟骨牵引组(n=33)。比较两组手术及预后相关指标差异。结果:外固定组入院到内固定时间、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间方面显著优于跟骨牵引组(P<0.05)。结论:临时跨关节外固定联合延期接骨板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅤ~Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折是一种可选择的治疗方式。 Background: Schatzker Ⅴ-Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures are complex with severely destroyed articular surface, and current treatment cannot protect the soft tissue around wound part well, therefore the prognosis is mostly unsatisfactory. Ob Objective: To study the effect of temporary inter articular external fixation and posterior interlocking plate fixation on Schatzker type Ⅴ-Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures. Methods: The clinical data of 67 patients with Schatzker type Ⅴ-Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures were collected from June 2014 to June 2016 in our hospital. All patients were divided into two groups as external fixation group(n=34) and calcaneus traction group(n=33) according to the different treatment. Differences in surgical and prognostic indicators were compared between the two groups. Results: The time from hospitalization to internal fixation, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time were significantly better in the external fixation group than in the calcaneal traction group(P〈0.05). Conclusions: Temporary inter articular external fixation in combination with posterior interlocking plate fixation is a better way for the treatment of patients with Schatzker type Ⅴ-Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures.
出处 《中华骨与关节外科杂志》 2017年第5期433-437,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
关键词 胫骨平台骨折 外固定器 膝关节 骨折固定术 Tibial Plateau Fracture External Fixator Knee Joint Fracture Fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1肖荣驰,李宁宁,唐志宏,蒋尧传,李强,刘钰,黄文春.内固定基础上应用骨形态发生蛋白人工骨与自体髂骨植骨治疗骨质疏松性髋骨折的效果比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(21):4077-4080. 被引量:4
  • 2Poul P Weizel,John C Richmond.Critical evaluation of different scoring systems of the knee.Sports Med Arthrosc Rev,2002,10:183-190.
  • 3Lysholm J,Gillquist J.Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.Am J Sports Med,1982,10:150-154.
  • 4Tegner Y,Lysholm J.Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.Clin Orthop,1985,(198):43-49.
  • 5Insall JN,Ranawat CS,Aglietti P,et al.A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses.JBJS Am,1976,58:754.
  • 6Insall JN,Dorr LD,Scott RD,et al.Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system.Clin Orthop,1989,(248):13.
  • 7Hefti F,Muller W,Jakob RP,et al.Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,1993,1:226-234.
  • 8Bellamy N,Buchanan WW,Goldsmith CH,et al.Validation study of WOMAC:a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis.J Orthop Rheumatol,1988,1:95-108.
  • 9Johanson NA,Liang MH,Daltroy L,et al.American academy of orthopaedic surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments.reliability,validity,and sensitivity to change.JBJS Am,2004,86:902-909.
  • 10Roos EM,Roos HP,Lohmander LS,et al.Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS):Development of a selfadministered outcome measure.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther,1998,78:88-96.

共引文献223

同被引文献39

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部