“V错-错V”结构差异及认知解释

A Study of Structural Differences of V-cuo ( 错) & cuo ( 错)-V and its Cognitive Analysis

形容词"错"的组合能力非常强,其作补语构成"V错"如:看错、信错、认错等;作状语构成"错V"如:错看、错信、错认等。状语和补语之间的对立在句法当中非常明显,而在词内当中却相对弱了许多,所以经常被忽视。本文从句法表现、语义指向和主观性、"四缺一"格局的形成及原因这三个方面,对"V错-错V"结构的差异进行比较分析并给出解释。

The adjective cuo（ 错） in mandarin Chinese is of high productivity in combination,which can be both served as a complement in kan-cuo（ 看错） 、xin-cuo（ 信错） 、ren-cuo（ 认错） and an adverbial in cuo-kan（ 错看） 、cuo-xin（ 错信） 、cuo-ren（ 错认）. The contrasting of complement and adverbial in syntactic grammar is more obvious than in lexical order,thus the latter is often neglected. This paper provides comparative analysis and explanation of the structural differences of V-cuo（ 错） cuo（ 错）-V from these three aspects： the syntactic representation,semantic orientation and subjectivity,the forming and genesis of Four-without-one phenomena.