摘要
海德格尔做出两种"自由"分类:一种是存在论意义上的"让……存在"的"自由",另一种是作为传统符合论真理观前提的"由主体拥有"的"自由"。这两种"自由"之间的根本差异决定了,在传统符合论真理观视野中的所谓"非真理"必然超出"命题真理"的"正确性"。这种"超出"之所以可能的根据正是来源于那种"让……存在"的"自在的自由",因为在存在论层面,"是自由占有了人而非人占有自由"。所以,"真理的本质是本质的真理"是海德格尔存在论真理观的必然结论。
It was evident that Heidegger divided two kinds of "freedom".One kind is the "freedom" of "lettingeverything exist".The other is the "freedom" which is possessed by the subject.In the sense of Heidegger's Ontology,the "freedom" of being-in-itself is the premise of man.On the other hand,the "freedom" is possessed by the subject and is not the premise of the "freedom" of being-initself.Therefore,what Heidegger mentioned? "the essence of truth isthe truth of essence" is actually the inevitable conclusion of Heidegger's ontological view of truth.
出处
《湖北成人教育学院学报》
2018年第1期84-87,共4页
Journal of Hubei Adult Education Institute
关键词
海德格尔
存在论
真理观
自由
Heidegger
Ontology
View of truth
freedom