期刊文献+

Ottawa足踝准则在急性足踝损伤X线检查中的临床意义

Clinical significance of Ottawa Ankle Rules in the X-ray examination for patients suffering acute foot and ankle injuries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析OAR指导急性足踝损伤患者接受X线检查的敏感性、特异性。方法 734例急性足踝损伤患者(足355例,踝379例),根据OAR判断患者是否需行X线检查,根据X线检查结果验证OAR敏感性、特异性。结果经X线检查后骨折患者99例,其中踝部骨折56例,占14.8%,足部骨折43例,占12.1%。734例患者中经OAR评估阳性行X片检查者424例(踝241例、足183例),减少临床阴性摄片率42.2%。OAR在踝部损伤组中敏感性100%,特异性42.7%,阳性预测值23.2%,准确率51.2%。OAR在足损伤检查中的敏感性100%,特异性55.1%,阳性预测值23.4%,准确率60.6%。结论科学使用OAR降低阴性摄片率,降低医疗成本,减少非必要的X线暴露。 Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the OAR in the guidance of X-ray determination for patients suffering acute ankle and foot injuries. Methods The OAR was applied to 734 cases,including 379 injuries of ankle,355 of foot. The outcomes of OAR,x-ray diagnosis were collected for evaluations.From these data the sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative likelihood ratios,and positives and negative predictive values were calculated.Results There were 99 cases of fracture after X-ray examination,of which 56 cases of ankle fracture,accounting for 14. 8%,43 of foot fracture,accounting for 12. 1%. Of the 734 patients,424 were examined by X-ray examination after OAR guidance( ankle 241,foot 183),reduced clinical negative film rate by 42. 2%. The sensitivity,specificity and positive predictive value of clinical negative radiographs in ankle injury were 100%,42.7%,and 23.2%,accuracy rate was 51.2%. The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and accuracy were 100%,55.1%,23.4% and 60.6% in foot injuries,respectively.Conclusions Scientific use of OAR can reduce negative radiography rates,reduce medical costs,and reduce non-essential X-ray exposures
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2017年第21期2531-2533,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 足踝 X线 OAR Acute ankle and foot injuries X-ray indications
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1张世民,袁锋,俞光荣.鉴别足踝和膝部单纯扭伤与骨折的快速诊断试验[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(23):1898-1900. 被引量:6
  • 2王欣,俞光荣,张世民,饶志涛,胡牧,贾永伟.鉴别足踝扭伤是否有骨折的快速诊断规则及其临床应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(1):99-100. 被引量:19
  • 3蒲祖辉,徐化剑,殷军明.膝关节骨折快速诊断规则临床应用的循证研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(2):122-125. 被引量:8
  • 4Brooks S C, Potter B T, Rainey J B. Inversion injuries of the an- kle: clinical assessment and radiographic review [J]. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) ,1981,282(6264) :607-608.
  • 5Sujitkumar P, Hadfield J M, Yates D W. Sprain or fracture? ananalysis of 2000 ankle injuries[J]: Arch Emerg Med, 1986,3(2), 101-106.
  • 6Jenkin M,Sitler M R,Kelly J D. Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for detecting fractures of the ankle and midfoot[J]. J Athl Train,2010,45(5):480-482.
  • 7Stiell I G, Greenberg G H, McKnight R D, et al. A study to de- velop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute an- kle injuries[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 1992,21(4) :384- 390.
  • 8Bachmann L M, Kolb E, Koller M T, et al. Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot., sys- tematic review[J]. BMJ, 2003,326 (7386) :417.
  • 9Fritz J M, Wainner R S. Examining diagnostic tests an evidence- based perspective[J]. Phys Ther,2001,81(9) :1546-1564.
  • 10Rodrigues P, Rosa I, Campagnolo J L. Validation of the Ottawa rules for the Portuguese population., a prospective study[J]. Acta Med Port,2011,24(5):713-718.

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部