期刊文献+

凹腔/支板结构亚燃冲压燃烧室性能 被引量:5

Performance of ramjet combustor based on cavity/strut structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了避免基于凹腔火焰稳定器的亚燃冲压燃烧室壁面喷注时燃料与主流空气掺混非均匀性问题和提高燃烧室的性能,提出在亚燃冲压燃烧室中使用支板喷注代替壁面喷注的方案,数值模拟了凹腔/支板结构亚燃冲压燃烧室中燃料分布及流场结构,并分析了支板结构对燃料空气混合及燃烧室性能的影响。研究表明:支板虽然使燃烧室出口的总压恢复系数相对于壁面喷注方式下的降低了6.3%,但能使燃料均匀分布于整个流道内,增强了燃料与空气掺混,使燃烧室出口的混合效率和燃烧效率分别提高了21.4%和20.5%。燃烧效率的提高弥补了采用支板导致的燃烧室内气流的额外总压损失所带来的机械能损失,使得支板喷注时燃烧室出口的比冲提高了39.6%。因此,在亚燃冲压燃烧室中设置凹腔/支板结构,有利于提高燃烧室整体性能。 Strut injection was proposed to replace wall injection in ramjet combustaor,in order to promote the combustion efficiency and avoid the problem of inhomogeneous mixing of fuel and mainstream,which was caused by fuel centralized near the wall with wall injection in ramjet combustor based on cavity flameholder.The distribution of fuel and flow field structure in ramjet combustor based on cavity/strut structure was simulated.The effects of strut on mixing and performance of ramjet combustor were studied.It was found that the strut made homogeneous fuel distribution in the whole flow channel,enhanced the mixing of fuel and air,enhanced the mixing efficiency and combustion efficiency of the combustor exit by 21.4% and 20.5% respectively,although it reduced the total pressure recovery coefficient of the combustor exit by 6.3% compared with that under the wall injection method.The improvement of combustion efficiency made up the additional total pressure loss,and increased the specific impulse of the combustor exit by 39.6% under the strut injection method.Therefore,it is good for improving the combustor performance when the cavity/strut structure is used in ramjet combustor.
出处 《航空动力学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期2355-2363,共9页 Journal of Aerospace Power
关键词 亚燃冲压燃烧室 凹腔/支板结构 混合效率 燃烧效率 支板喷注 ramjet combustor cavity/strut structure mixing efficiency combustion efficiency strut injection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1毕士冠.国外超声速巡航导弹发展战略与技术途径讨论(下)——类别地位与发展态势评析[J].飞航导弹,2007(2):1-8. 被引量:17
  • 2赵黛青,夏亮,山下博史.旋转流中预混合火焰的高速传播现象——I.稳燃特性及燃烧效率的提高[J].过程工程学报,2007,7(3):457-461. 被引量:3
  • 3刘兴洲.飞航导弹动力装置[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1992.
  • 4Brophy C M, Hawk C W. Mixing and combustion studies of four-inlet side dump combustors[R]. AIAA 96-2765.
  • 5Khosla S, Leach T T,Smith C E. Flame stabilization and role of yon karman vortex shedding behind bluff body flameholders[R]. AIAA 2007-5653.
  • 6Dally B B, Fletcher D F, Masri A R. Flow and mixing fields of turbulent bluff-body jets and flames[J]. Combust. Theory Modeling,1998,2(2) : 193-219.
  • 7Vinogradov V,Grachery V. Experimental investigation of 2-D dual mode scramjet with hydrogen fuel at Mach 4-6 [R]. AIAAg0-5268.
  • 8Hsu K Y,Gross L P,Trump D D,et al. Performance of a trapped vortex combustor[R]. AIAA 95 0810.
  • 9Bruno C, Losurdo M. Numerical simulations of trapped vortex combustion for application to ramjets [C]//Proceedings of the Flameless Combustion Workshop. Lund, Sweden: [s. n. ],2005.
  • 10Marble F E,Zukoski E E. Flame holding and bluff bodies [C]//12th meeting of AGARD combustion and propulsion panel. Washington, DC : [s. n. ], November 1957.

共引文献17

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部