期刊文献+

糖皮质激素治疗后中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对慢加急性肝衰竭预后的预测价值 被引量:4

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) after glucocorticoid therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对糖皮质激素治疗后慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)预后的预测价值.方法 收集明确诊断慢加急性肝衰竭应用糖皮质激素治疗患者36例,包括存活组23例、死亡组13例,观察激素治疗前、过程中、治疗后WBC、N、L、NLR、TBil、PTA、INR等指标变化,分析NLR与慢加急性肝衰竭预后的关系.结果 糖皮质激素治疗后NLR,存活组3.95±2.65,死亡组12.79±10.66,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);单因素及多因素回归分析表明,NLR是评价激素治疗后慢加急性肝衰竭预后的独立危险因素之一.NLR预测慢加急性肝衰竭预后时,ROC曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)0.868(95% CI:0.743~0.993),激素治疗后NLR< 3.315慢加急性肝衰竭患者3个月内生存率越高.结论 对于应用激素治疗的慢加急性肝衰竭患者,NLR是评估其预后的重要指标之一. Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) after glucocorticoid therapy.Methods Thirty-six patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) were treated with glucocorticoid therapy,of whom 23 patients in the survival group and the other in the deceased group (n =13).The changes of white blood cells,neutrophils,lymphocytes,NLR,total bilirubin (TBil),prothrombin activity (PTA),international normalized ratio (INR) were observed before,during and after treatment,and the relationship between NLR and prognosis was analyzed.Results NLR after glucocorticoid treatment,the survival group 3.95 ± 2.65,the deceased group 12.79 ± 10.66,there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001).According to univariate and multivariate logisitic regression analysis,NLR ratio was one of the independent factor in ACLF.ROC curve showed the AUC of NLR in patients with ACLF 0.868 (95 % CI:0.743-0.993).After glucocorticoid treatment,the survival rate of NLR < 3.315 patients with acute liver failure was high.Conclusions NLR is one of the important indexes for evaluating the prognosis of ACLF patients with ACLF due to glucocorticoid therapy.
出处 《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2017年第6期554-557,共4页 Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项重点攻关项目(2011-2018-09)
关键词 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 慢加急性肝衰竭 预后 The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) Predictive
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献67

  • 1饶慧瑛,郭芳,魏来.2005年美国肝病学会急性肝衰竭诊治和肝移植患者评价指南简介[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2006,14(2):154-156. 被引量:23
  • 2Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association.肝衰竭诊疗指南[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2006,14(9):643-646. 被引量:830
  • 3Poison J, Lee WM, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. AASLD position paper: the management of acute liver failure. Hepatology, 2005, 41 (5) : 1179-1197.
  • 4Sarin SK, Kumar A, Almeida JA, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure : consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL). Hepatol Int, 2009, 3(1 ) : 269-282.
  • 5Lee WM, Stravitz RT, Larsin AM, et al. Introduction to the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Position Paper on acute liver failure 2011. Hepatology, 2012, 55 ( 3 ) : 965-967.
  • 6Deng G, Zhou G, Zhai Y, et al. Association of estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms with susceptibility to chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology, 2004, 40(2) :318-326.
  • 7Yan Z, Tan W, Xu B, et al. A cis-acting regulatory variation of estrogen receptor α ( ESR1 ) gene is associated with hepatitis B virus related liver cirrhosis. Hum Mutat, 2011,32 ( 10 ) : 1128-1136.
  • 8Bernal W, Auzinger G, Dhawan A, et al. Acute liver failure. Lancet, 2010, 376(9736) : 190-201.
  • 9Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiaodt FV, et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 teriary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med, 2002,137 (12) :947-954.
  • 10Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J, et al. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology, 2010, 51(6): 2117-2126.

共引文献418

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部