期刊文献+

条件证据网络的地面防空体系能力评估 被引量:2

Capability Evaluation of Ground Air-Defense System Based on Directed Evidential Network
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对地面防空体系能力需求满足度评估中输入的评估信息的不确定性问题,提出了基于条件证据网络的地面防空体系能力需求满足度评估方法。该方法利用专家知识和历史信息进行条件证据网络参数建模,即利用条件信度函数描述下层能力或指标满足需求的程度与上层能力需求满足度之间的关系,在此基础上,利用条件证据网络正向推理得出体系能力满足使命任务需求的信度分布。最后用一个算例,分析了该方法的可用性和有效性。 Aiming at the uncertainty of the evaluation information entered in the requirement satisfactory degree evaluation of capability of ground air-defense systems,a method based on directed evidential network with conditional belief functions is proposed,which uses expert knowledge and historical information to carry on evidential network parameter modeling,i. e.,the conditional belief functions are used to describe the relationship between the degree of the lower level capability satisfying the demand and the degree of the upper layer capability satisfying the demand. On this basis,the evidential network is used to predict the belief distribution of capability of the system satisfying the demand. The feasibility and effectiveness of the method are analyzed by an example.
出处 《现代防御技术》 2018年第1期27-34,共8页 Modern Defence Technology
关键词 条件证据网络 不确定性 地面防空体系 体系能力 需求满足度评估 信度分布 directed evidential network with conditional belief functions uncertainty ground air defense system of systems system of systems capability requirement satisfactory degree evaluation belief distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献37

  • 1倪忠仁.武器装备体系对抗的建模与仿真[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2004,18(1):2-6. 被引量:44
  • 2宋太亮,王琴琴,黄金娥.基于能力的装备保障性能研究[J].中国舰船研究,2012,7(3):1-8. 被引量:6
  • 3王礼沅,董彦非,江洋溢,张恒喜.攻击机反舰作战能力评估的综合指数模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(5):771-773. 被引量:6
  • 4DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 2.0[R]. USA: Department of Defense, 2009.
  • 5Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 6Yang J B, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach RIMER[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36(2): 266 285.
  • 7Yang J B, Xu D L. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A : Systems and Humans, 2002, 32(3): 289-304.
  • 8Bustince H, Burillo P. Mathematical analysis of interval-valued fuzzy relations: Application to approximate reasoning[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113:205-219.
  • 9Chen S M,Hsiao W H. Bidirectional approximate reasoning for rule-based systems using interval-valued fllzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113:185-203.
  • 10Viaene S, Wets G, Vanthienen J. A synthesis of fuzzy rule-based system verification[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113:253-265.

共引文献83

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部