期刊文献+

Topping-off技术防治椎间融合后邻近节段椎间盘退变实验研究 被引量:2

Effects of Coflex interspinous stabilization on the prevention of adjacent segment degeneration after spine fusion in dog models
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨后路棘突间动态固定装置Coflex对比格犬腰椎间融合后相邻上位节段椎间盘退变的保护作用。方法选用16只健康成年比格犬,应用经皮穿刺比格犬腰椎间隙损伤椎间盘方法建立腰椎间盘退变动物模型,用配对比较法随机分为仅行椎间融合的对照组及行椎间融合加相邻节段Coflex置入(Toppingoff技术)的实验组,术后3、6个月行MRI检查、髓核组织II型胶原(COL-2)阳性细胞数及基质金属蛋白酶阻滞剂-1(TIMP-1)和骨形态发生蛋白-15(BMP-15)内参基因GAPDH含量测定。结果 MRI检查显示对照组与实验组犬腰椎间盘均有不同程度退变,实验组MRI T2图像半定量分析结果为2.92±0.21,对照组为1.69±0.11,实验组较对照组退变程度轻,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组术后6个月髓核的COL-2阳性细胞含量为8.66±1.31,较术后3个月时的12.33±1.24明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组术后6个月时TIMP-1、BMP-15基因表达量分别为1.86±0.14和1.98±0.24较术后3个月时的0.70±0.12和0.78±0.13明显上升,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组第3、6个月自身对照髓核的COL-2阳性细胞含量,TIMP-1、BMP-15基因表达量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组术后6个月髓核COL-2阳性细胞含量为11.33±1.74,明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),TIMP-1、BMP-15的基因表达量分别为0.85±0.13和0.98±0.14,明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论后路棘突间固定装置Coflex对比格犬的腰椎间盘退变有一定保护作用,对椎间融合后相邻节段退变有一定延缓作用。 Objective Interspinous spacers( ISPs) are promising in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration( ASD) after the spine fusion. Coflex is one of ISPs, however, its effectiveness evidence is still very limited. The purpose of this study is to further investigate the effects of Coflex in vivo after the spine fusion when implanted in beagle dogs. Methods The model of lumbar disc degeneration was established by percutaneous puncture of the intervertebral disc under the fluoroscopy. 16 healthy adult beagle dogs were randomly divided into the Control Group( L6-7 intervertebral fusion) and Experiment Group( L6-7 intervertebral fusion plus L5-6 interspinous process Coflex dynamic fixation) using paired comparison method. All were followed up for 6 months after the initial operation. Spine MRI images were evaluated at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Immunohistochemical and gene expression analyses were also performed at 3 and 6 months. Results Degeneration was observed in both Control and Experiment Group in MRI images. Outcomes of semi quantitative analysis of T2 images were( 2.92 ± 0.21) and( 1.69 ± 0.11) in the experiment and Control Group, respectively. The Control Group showed a more significant degeneration than the Experiment Group( P 0.05). The number of COL-2 positive cells decreased from( 12.33 ± 1.24) 3 months postoperatively to( 8.66 ± 0.14) 6 months postoperatively with statistical significance in the Control Group( P 0.05). Real-time PCR demonstrated that TIMP-1 and BMP-15 gene expressions increased from( 0.70 ± 0.12),( 0.78 ± 0.13) 3 months postoperatively to( 1.86 ± 0.14),( 1.98 ± 0.24) 6 months postoperatively with statistical significance( P 0.05) in the Control Group. There were no significant differences in the number of COL-2 positive cells, TIMP-1 and BMP-15 expressions in the Experiment Group at 3 and 6 months( P 0.05). The number of COL-2 positive cells was( 11.33 ± 1.74) in the Experiment Group at 6 months, which was significant more than that in the Control Group( P 0.05). TIMP-1 and BMP-15 gene expressions were( 0.85 ± 0.13),( 0.98 ± 0.14) in the Experiment Group, which were significantly lower than that in the Control Group 6 months postoperatively( P 0.05). ConclusionsIntervertebral fusion could aggravate the degeneration of adjacent-segment intervertebral discs and Coflex could decelerate the progression of ASD after spine fusion.
作者 梁博 徐建广
出处 《中国骨与关节杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期110-114,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
基金 上海市市级医院新兴前沿技术联合攻关项目(SHDC2014102)
关键词 椎间盘退行性变 腰椎 内固定器 非融合技术 Intervertebral disc degeneration Lumbar vertebrae Intemal fixators Non-fusion technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1连平,孙荣华,杨维权,王维民,刘大雄,张连生,杨广才,贾连顺,戴力杨,徐印坎,张永涛.腰椎椎管与硬膜囊横截面积及其动态变化的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,1995,33(3):151-154. 被引量:17
  • 2McKenna PJ,Freeman BJ,Mulholland RC,et al. A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2- year clinical results. Eur Spine J, 2005,14 (8) :727-737.
  • 3Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Assessment of surgical treatment of low back pain. Jpn Orthop Assoc, 1984,58 : 1183-1187.
  • 4Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability. J Korean Med Sci, 2007,22 (2) : 330-335.
  • 5Gupta S, Soellinger M, Boesiger P, et al. Three-dimensional computational modeling of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow in the subarachnoid space. J Biomech Eng, 2009,131 (2) : 021010.
  • 6Richards JC, Majumdar S,Lindsey DP,et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine, 2005,30 (7): 744-749.
  • 7Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17 (8) : 1049-1056.
  • 8Bono CM ,Vaecaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007,20 (3) : 255-261.
  • 9Mulholland RC,Sengupta DK. Rationale,principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J, 2002,11 (Suppl 2) :S198-205.
  • 10Chiba K,Andersson GB,Masuda K,et al.A new culture system to study the metabolism of the intervertebral disc in vitro.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1998;23(17):1821-1827.

共引文献37

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部