期刊文献+

环境噪声对儿童短时记忆力和注意力的影响 被引量:4

Effects of environment noise on children’s short-term memory and attention stability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过实验室研究探讨了不同噪声源在不同声压级条件下对儿童短时记忆力和注意力的影响。在每一个实验中都选取了30名7-10岁的儿童作为被试,在他们完成相应认知任务的同时,用耳机随机播放35-65 dBA的交通噪声、白噪声和空调噪声,考察各种噪声条件对被试认知成绩和主观烦恼度的影响。研究结果表明,噪声对儿童的影响主要体现在主观烦恼度的变化上,不同的噪声条件并没有引起作业成绩的显著差异。影响儿童主观烦恼度的主要因素是声压级,随着声压级的增大,儿童的烦恼度会增加,当声压级在45-50 dBA时,儿童对噪声开始产生烦恼感,当声压级在60-65 dBA时,儿童对噪声产生了较显著的烦恼感。声压级对儿童烦恼度的影响没有随着噪声源的改变而改变。在相同的噪声条件下,短时记忆力实验中儿童的主观烦恼度都高于注意力实验,说明随着认知过程复杂程度的增加,噪声引起的烦恼度会相应增加。 In this study, how the different noise sources and noise levels affect children's attention and short-term memory was explored by two experiments respectively. In each experiment 30 children from 7-10 years old participated in and they were asked to finish certain cognitive tasks while white noise, air-conditioner noise and road traffic noise were broadcasted randomly. The noise level of each noise source varied from 35 dBA to 65 dBA with a step of 5 dB, which simulated ordinary noise level in indoor conditions. The results showed that compared with task performance, subjective annoyance evaluation was more sensitive to noise effects. Noise level significantly affected children's noise annoyance evaluation whatever noise source was. Children showed a little annoyed when noise level was at 45 50 dBA and showed apparent annoyance when noise level was 60-65 dBA. The adverse effects of environment noise to children' s short-term memory was more obvious than that of attention, which showed more complicated of the cognitive process, more adverse effects brought by noise though it needed to be proved by further studies.
作者 张兰 马蕙
出处 《声学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期246-252,共7页 Acta Acustica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51478303) 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国际重点实验室面上项目(2012KB07)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Namba S. On the psychological measurement of loudness, noisiness and annoyance: a review. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E), 1987; 8(6): 211-222.
  • 2Yano T et al. On the percent highly annoyed in community responses to noise as measured by the ICBEN 5-point scale in Japanese. Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, Prague, August, 2004.
  • 3Kryter K D. The effects of noise on man. New York & London: Academic Press Inc., 1985; 11:526-619.
  • 4Finegold L S, Finegold M S. Development of exposureresponse relationships between transportation noise and community annoyance. Japan Net-Symposium on "Annoyance, Stress and Health Effects of Environmental Noise", 2002.
  • 5Schultz T J. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 1978; 64(2): 377-405.
  • 6Fields J Met al. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001; 242(4): 641-679.
  • 7Fields J M et al. Guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997; 206:685-695.
  • 8Levinen N. The development of an annoyance scale for com- munity noise assessment. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1981; 74(2): 265-279.
  • 9Yano T, Ma H. Standardized noise annoyance scales in Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004; 277(3): 583-588.
  • 10Lang W W. Is noise policy a global issue, or is it a local issue? Noise Control Engineering, 2001; 49(4): 155-158.

共引文献31

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部