摘要
在过去百余年以西方哲学为主导的解释中国传统哲学实践中,道家的"道"是受到重点关注的范畴之一。"道"分别接受了具有西方身份的唯物认知范式、科学认知范式、人文认知范式的认识和理解,从而呈现出了新的多样内涵,"道"之意涵得到了丰富和发展;同时也接受了具有中国身份的自我认知范式的认知和理解,从而呈现了"道"的本色。但由于唯物认知范式、科学认知范式、人文认知范式与中国传统哲学并非源自同一文化系统而出现理解上的失误,因而必须与中国本土学说或方法合作,才能顺利并有成效地实现对中国传统哲学的理解,进而推动中国传统哲学的进步。
In the interpretation of Chinese traditional philosophy practice guided by Western philoso-phy in the past hundred years,Taoism's "Tao" is one of the categories that is subject to the key concern. “ Tao” respectively accepts the recognition and the understanding of the materialist cogni-tive paradigm,the scientific cognitive paradigm,and the humanistic cognitive paradigm with Western identity, thus presenting a new and diverse connotation, the meaning of "Tao ", has been enriched and developed ; at the same time, it also accepts the cognition and understanding of the self cognitive par-adigm with Chinese identity, thus presenting the essence of ^Tao^. There is a mistake in understand-ing because the materialist cognitive paradigm,the scientific cognitive paradigm, the humanistic cog- nitive paradigm and Chinese traditional philosophy are not the same cultural system. In order to un-derstand the Chinese Traditional philosophy successfully and effectively, the materialist cognitive par-adigm, the scientific cognitive paradigm and the humanistic cognitive paradigm must cooperate with Chinese native theories or methods, thus the progress of Chinese traditional philosophy can be promoted.
出处
《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期56-63,共8页
Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"20世纪中国传统哲学与马克思主义哲学
西方哲学关系的历史考察"(编号:13AZD021)
关键词
四个维度
唯物认知范式
科学认知范式
人文认知范式
自我认知范式
four dimensions
materialist cognitive paradigm
scientific cognitive paradigm
humanistic cognitive paradigm
self cognitive paradigm