摘要
在网络人身侵权案件中,受害人在寻求司法救济时会遇到避风港规则与网络匿名制的障碍,这种障碍反映出受害人的人身权利与国家产业政策、公众言论自由与隐私权之间的冲突。为保护受害人的权益,我国引入了网络信息披露制度,要求网络服务提供者披露侵权人的身份信息,但对信息披露的具体条件及其法律后果却未明确。为了公正地行使自由裁量权,司法机关应当根据救济效益、责任适度和最小伤害原则,在利益衡量的基础之上分配各方的权利与责任。
In the case of cyber-personal infringement,the victim encounters an obstacle of the rules of the safe harbor and the network anonymity when seeking judicial relief.This obstacle reflects the conflict between the personal rights of the victim and the national industrial policy,the freedom of speech and the right to privacy.In order to protect the rights and interests of the victims,China has introduced a third party information disclosure system,and required the network service provider to disclose the identity of the infringer,but the specific conditions of information disclosure and related legal consequences are short of explanation.In order to properly implement the information disclosure system,the judge shall allocate the rights and responsibilities of the parties on the basis of the principle of minimum injury,responsibility moderation and relief.
出处
《黑龙江工程学院学报》
CAS
2018年第1期55-57,共3页
Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Technology
基金
安徽财经大学校级科研课题(ACKY1642)
关键词
信息披露
司法裁量
避风港
网络匿名制
information disclosure
judicial discretion
safe harbor
network anonymity