期刊文献+

CRS-R量表各项目在意识状态评估中重要性的统计分析 被引量:4

Statistical Analysis of the Sensitivity of CRS-R Scale Projects in Consciousness Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察修订的昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)中各项目在意识状态评估中重要性的差异。方法:应用中文版CRS-R量表对480例意识障碍患者进行评估。将数据导入SPSS 17.0统计软件中,利用其相关性分析功能和决策树功能,分析各个项目与意识状态之间的相关性,并分析这种相关性的差异是否具有统计学意义。结果:运动、听觉、视觉与意识状态的相关性最高;各个项目与意识状态的相关性相比,运动与其他项目之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),听觉、视觉与其他项目之间的差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但听觉与视觉之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CRS-R量表各项目在意识状态评估中重要性不同,运动、听觉、视觉相比其他项目更加需要重视。 Objective: To observe the differences in the importance of the items in the conscious state assessment of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R). Methods: A total of 480 patients with disturbance of consciousness were assessed by Chinese version of CRS-R. The data were introduced into SPSS 17.0 statistical software, and the correlation between each project and the state of consciousness was analyzed by using the correlation analysis function and decision tree function. It was analyzed whether the difference of this correlation was statistically significant. Results: The correlation between exercise, hearing, visual and consciousness status was the highest; the difference between exercise and other items was statistically significant(P0.05), auditory, visual and other items(P0.05), but the difference between auditory and visual acuity was not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion: The CRS-R are different in the importance of the state of mind assessment, and the exercise, hearing and visual needs are more important than other items.
出处 《康复学报》 2017年第5期17-21,28,共6页 Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 意识障碍 意识量表 意识状态 评估项目 consciousness disorder, consciousness scale, conscious state, evaluation item
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1Teasdale G,Jennett B.Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness:A practical scale[J].Lancet,1974,2(7872):81-84.
  • 2Marion DW,Carlier PM.Problems with initial Glasgow Coma Scale assessment caused by prehospital treatment of patients with head injuries:results of a national survey[J].J Trauma,1994,36 (1):89-95.
  • 3Moskopp D,St(a)hle C,Wassmann H.Problems of the Glasgow Coma Scale with early intubated patients[J].Neurosurgical review,1995,18(4):253-257.
  • 4Laureys S,Owen AM,Schiff ND,et al.Brain function in coma,vegetative state,and related disorders[J].Lancet Neurol,2004,3(9):537-546.
  • 5Giacino JT,Ashwal S,Childs N,et al.The minimally conscious state:definition and diagnostic criteria[J].Neurology,2002,58(3):349-353.
  • 6Giacino JT,Kalmar K,Whyte J.The JFK Coma Recovery Measur-ement characteristics and diagnostic utility[J].Archives of physicalAnd rehabilitation,2004,85(12):2020-2029.
  • 7Giacino JT,Smart CM.Recent advances in behavioral assessment of individuals with disorders of consciousness[J].Curr Opin Neurol,2007,20(6):614-619.
  • 8王重鸣.心理学研究方法[M].2版.北京:人民教育出版社,2001:134-146.
  • 9费立鹏.心理卫生量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:427-436.
  • 10Schnakers C,Majerus S,Giacino J,et al.A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)[J].Brain Inj,2008,22(10):786-792.

共引文献89

同被引文献47

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部