期刊文献+

现当代文学批评传统新解——评布拉德福德《莎士比亚好不好?:论文学质量评判》 被引量:2

Is Shakespeare Any Good?: And Other Questions on How to Evaluate Literature: A New Diagnosis of Modern and Contemporary Literary Criticism
原文传递
导出
摘要 在其专著《莎士比亚好不好?:论文学质量评判》中,布拉德福德重审了现当代西方文学批评及教育史,重新定义了文学现代主义运动的性质,并对其影响进行了再评估,指出"质量评判"的缺失是现当代文学批评传统的主要特征,这对文学与文学批评的发展带来了负面影响。此书虽成书早于2016年诺贝尔奖颁奖,却有助于我们剖析迪伦获奖背后的逻辑,并提供了审视文学研究现状的新视角。 In Is Shakespeare Any Good: And Other Questions on How to Evaluate Literature, Richard Bradford re-examines the history of modern and contemporary literary criticism and education, re-defines the nature of literary modernism as a literary movement, and re-evaluates its impact on literature, pointing out that the absence of evaluation, a main feature of present-day literary criticism, exerts a negative impact on the development of literature and its criticism. The monograph offers a new perspective on the status quo of literary criticism, and although published before the 2016 Nobel Prize of Literature "scandal", Bradford's work functions as a useful model for analyzing the making of Bob Dylan's Nobel Prize.
作者 陈星
出处 《当代外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期149-155,共7页 Contemporary Foreign Literature
关键词 理查德·布拉德福德 文学质量评判 文学现代主义 文学批评 Richard Bradford, literary evaluation, literary modernism, literary criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1Arts and Humanities Research Council ( AHRC ). Impact Summary and Pathways to Impact: Frequently AskedQuestions—AHRC. <http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/documents/faq/impact-summary-and-pathways-to-impact-frequently-asked-questions-ahrc/>.
  • 2Clare, Janet. Shakespeare,s Stage Traffic: Imitation, Borrowing and Competition in Renaissance Theatre.Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014.
  • 3DiPietro, Cary, and Hugh Grady. “Introduction.” Shakespeare and the Urgency of Now: Criticism and Theory in the21st Century. Ed. Cary DiPietro and Hugh Grady. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 2013. 1-8.
  • 4Eagleton, Terry. How to Read a Poem. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.
  • 5Escolme, Bridget. Emotional Excess on the Shakespearean Stage: Passion’s Slaves. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
  • 6Femie, Ewan. “Shakespeare and the Prospects of Presentism.” Shakespeare Survey 58 ( 2005 ) : 169-84.
  • 7Gajowski,Evelyn. “Beyond Historicism: Presentism, Subjectivity, Politics.” Literature Compass 7.8 (2010):674-91.
  • 8Grady, Hugh. “Shakespeare Studies, 2005; A Situated Overview/’ Shakespeare 1.1-2( 2005 ): 102-20.
  • 9Gray, Patrick, and John D. Dox. “Introduction.” Shakespeare and Renaissance Ethics. Ed. Patrick Gray and John D.Dox. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. 1-34.
  • 10Greenblatt, Stephen. “Resonance and Wonder.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43.3 ( 1990 ):11-34.

共引文献3

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部