摘要
杨永红副教授《对新编〈国际公法学〉教材中国际责任法的几点看法》一文基于2001年的《国家对国际不法行为的责任条款》(以下简称《200l条款》),片面将国家对国际不法行为的责任等同于国际责任,机械地将{20re条款》理解为国际责任的确定性法律制度,甚至将其当作国际责任制度的全部,对马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重点教材《国际公法学》第十五章进行了辛辣批判,其观点反映了作者对国际责任制度发展了解不全,盲目套用类比国际文件的观点和术语,可能会对国际法学共同体产生误导和负面影响。
Based on the 2001"A state’s clause of responsibility for an internationally wrongful act"( hereinafter referred to as the"2001 clause"),the paper Some Views on the Chapter of International responsibility Law in the New Textbook of Public International Law written by Yang Yonghong,an associate professor from School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science & Law,mechanically understood the state’s responsibility of international wrongful acts as equivalent to international responsibility,and even regarded as the whole content of the system of international responsibility.He made a pungent criticism of the fifteenth chapter of the engineering textbook,Public International Law. The paper reflects the author’s incomplete understanding of the development of international responsibility system,and blind application of the viewpoints and terms of analogy to international documents,which may lead to misunderstanding and negative effects on the community of international law.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期121-126,共6页
Academics
关键词
国家责任
国际法律责任
责任形式
限制主权
国际不法行为
state’s responsibility
international legal responsibility
form of liability
restriction of sovereignty
international wrongful act