期刊文献+

西方发达国家高等教育社会筹资:经验、特点及趋势 被引量:9

The Status, Experience and Trends of Higher Education Fundraising in Western Developed Countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 进入21世纪后,迫于财政压力,社会筹资成为西方高等教育多元化经费来源的重要渠道。目前,欧美国家高等教育的社会筹资呈现出不同发展状态。西方高等教育筹资发展得益于税收减免制度的倒逼机制、政府配比政策的激励效益、大学基金会市场化运营管理及专业协会的推动。大学筹资模式趋于集中化、专业化发展,捐赠人动机转向"合作"理念,是西方国家高等教育筹资的重要发展态势。西方大学的社会筹资经验从制度保障、捐赠文化培育、大学基金运行管理三方面为我国大学筹资提供了可借鉴的经验。 During 21st century, under the financial pressure, fundraising has become an important channel for diversified financial sources for western higher education. At present, the United States, Britain and European countries present different status in HE fundraising. Their experience mainly includes: tax deduction policy incentives persistence donations; governmental match fund policy balances the fundraising gap among universities; maturely marketization of endowment investment and professional association promotion. The fundraising trends are moving towards more centralized, specialized and "cooperation" transformation of donor motivation. HE fundraising in China has tremendous potential. Reaction in tax system, giving culture and incentive policy are necessary for vigorously promoting Chinese university fundraising.
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期98-105,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 2017年国家哲学社会科学课题"高等教育强国视角下的大学筹融资研究"(课题号:BIAI 70176)研究成果
关键词 发达国家 高等教育 社会筹资 Developed country Higher education fundraising Fundraising experience
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献36

  • 1CHOI S. Meritocratic epistemic communities: An ahemative policy paradigm for higher education [J]. Higher Education Quarterly, 2015, 69(1): 58-78.
  • 2WILLIAMS G. Fifty interesting years: Higher education fi~nding and financial management 1961-2011 [J]. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2012, 16(2): 51-55.
  • 3MILLER B. The price of higher education: How rational is British tuition fee policy? [J].Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2010, 32(1): 85-95.
  • 4HANADA S. Japan's higher education incorporation policy: A comparative analysis of three stages of national university governance [J]. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2013, 35 (5): 537-552.
  • 5LONG B. Losing sight of Humboldt: A synoptic review of Australian government policy over the last 35 years [J]. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2010, 34(3): 451-465.
  • 6HARR1S B. Corporatisation, mauagerialism and the death of the university ideal [J]. Australia Journal of Politics and Law, 2014, 7(2): 63-80.
  • 7CARPENTIER V. Public-private substitution in higher education: Has cost-sharing gone too far?[J].Higher Education Quarterly, 2012,66(4): 363-390.
  • 8MITCHELL M, PALACIOS V, LEACHMAN M. States are still funding higher education below pre-recession levels [M]. Washington, D.C.: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2014.
  • 9DOUGHERTY K J, NATOW R S. The Demise of Higher Education Performance Funding Systems in Three States [M]. CCRC Working Paper No. 17. Community College Research Center, Columbia University, 2009.
  • 10KIMBER M, EHRICH L C. Are Australia's universities in deficit? A tale of generic managers, audit culture and casualisation [J]. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2015, 37(1): 83-97.

共引文献8

同被引文献90

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部