期刊文献+

中文版疼痛评估软件在老年术后患者中应用的信、效度分析 被引量:116

Analysis of reliability and validity of Chinese version software for pain assessment among elderly patients after surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的测评中文版疼痛评估软件的信效度,为老年术后患者疼痛评估提供工具。方法对疼痛评估软件内容严格遵循"翻译—回译—文化调适—预实验"程序进行修订、翻译最终形成中文版疼痛评估软件,2015年6—7月选取98例择期手术的老年患者进行疼痛评分检验其信效度。结果疼痛评估软件经主成分分析共提取出静息、床上活动、进食、深呼吸、咳嗽5个公因子共20个条目,累计贡献率为80.184%,各维度与常用面部表情评分表(FPS)及数字评分表(NRS)的相关系数为0.586~0.933,总Cronbach′s α系数为0.912。结论疼痛评估软件性能良好,具有很高的信度和较高的效度,用于评估老年患者术后疼痛效果可靠。 ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version software for pain assessment, so as to provide an instrument for postoperative pain assessment in elderly.MethodsWe strictly revised and translated the software for pain assessment into Chinese version according to the program of "translation-back translation-cultural adaptation-pre experiment". From June to July 2015, 98 elderly patients who would undergo surgery were selected as the research object, and they were evaluated by pain score to test the reliability and validity.ResultsPain assessment software extracted a total of 20 items of 5 common factors including tranquillization, bed activity, eating, deep breathing and cough by principal component analysis (PCA) , which could explain 80.184% of total variances. The Correlated coefficients between each dimension and faces pain scale (FPS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) were between 0.586-0.933. The Cronbach′s α coefficient was 0.912 for the total scale.ConclusionsThe pain assessment software has good performance, high reliability and high validity. It can be used to evaluate the reliability of postoperative pain in elderly patients.
作者 王静 吕风云
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2017年第34期4358-4362,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 济宁医学院校级科研项目(JY2015KJ032)
关键词 老年人 疼痛测定 评估软件 信度 效度 Aged Pain assessment Assessment software Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1赵勤俭,刘军红,井坤娟.手术病人对自控镇痛认知与需求及相关因素的调查分析[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(22):55-57. 被引量:4
  • 2Merboth M K, Barnason S. Managing pain: the fifth vi- tal sign[J]. Nurs Clin North Am,2000,35(2):375- 383.
  • 3张菊英,林梅.疼痛强度记录单在疼痛全程护理中的应用体会[J].护士进修杂志,2007,22(15):1422-1423. 被引量:22
  • 4Takai Y,Yamamoto-Mitani N,Okamoto Y,et al.Literature review of pain pre-valence among older residents of nursing homes.Pain Manag Nurs.2010,11:209-223.
  • 5Feldt KS,Ryden MB,Miles S.Treatment of pain in cognitively impaired compared with cognitively intact older patients with hip-fracture.J Am Geriatr Soc,1998,46:1079-1085.
  • 6Taylor LJ,Herr K.Pain intensity assessment:a comparison of selected pain intensity scales for use in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired African American older adults.Pain Manag Nurs.2003.4:87-95.
  • 7Herr KA,Spratt K,Mobily PR,et al.Pain intensity assessment in older adults:use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults.Clin J Pain,2004,20:207-219.
  • 8Tousignant-Laflamme Y,Tousignant M,Lussier D,et al.Educational needs of health care providers working in long-term care facilities with regard to pain management.Pain Res Manag,2012,17:341-346.
  • 9Jones KR,Vojir CP,Hutt E,et al.Determining mild,moderate,and severe pain equivalency across painintensity tools in nursing home residents.J Rehabil Res Dev,2007,44:305-314.
  • 10Ware LJ,Epps CD,Herr K,et al.Evaluation of the revised faces pain Scale,verbal descriptor scale,numeric rating scale,and Iowa pain thermometer in older minority adults.Pain Manag Nurs,2006,7:117-125.

共引文献500

同被引文献1196

引证文献116

二级引证文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部