期刊文献+

父母用应对方式量表的修订及其在学前残疾儿童家长中的适用性 被引量:4

Revision and Application of the Coping Health Inventory for Parents among the Chinese Parents with Preschool Disabled Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:修订父母用应对方式量表(The Coping Health Inventory for Parents,CHIP),检验修订后量表在学前残疾儿童父母群体中的信度和效度,并揭示学前残疾儿童父母应对方式水平与特点。方法:以307名学龄前残疾儿童父母为对象进行问卷调查,并在6周后对其中53人进行重测。结果:修订后量表在原45个条目基础上保留40个条目,因素分析结果维持三个因子;总量表及三个分量表的α系数在0.816以上,分量表重测信度为0.354~0.492(P<0.01);各分量表与校标量表的相关分析结果显示出良好的效标关联效度。验证性因素分析指标均符合测量学要求。学前残疾儿童父母积极应对方式水平较低,在父母性别、家庭收入、儿童残疾类别与残疾程度因素上存在显著差异。结论:修订后父母用应对方式量表在学前残疾儿童家长群体中的信度、效度较高,可以作为考察学前残疾儿童家长应对方式特点的理想工具。 Objective: To revise The Coping Health Inventory for Parents( CHIP) and examine its validity and reliability among the Chinese parents with preschool disable children. It also reveals the level and characteristics of parents' coping style of preschool disabled children. Methods: Data were collected from a sample of 307 parents with disable children with 53 parents retested on the basis of the initial survey six weeks later. Results: 40 items of the 45-CHIP should be retained with three factors taking into consideration in the factor analysis. Cronbach's α of the whole scale and its subscales were above 0.816,and that of the subscales ranged from 0. 354-0. 492( P 0. 01). Significant correlations were found between the empathy quotient and three subscales of the CHIP. The results of CFA showed that questionnaire fitted the data with well construet validity. The indexes of confirmatory factor analysis were all in conformity with the requirements of measurement. The level of parents' positive coping style of preschool disabled children is relatively lower,and there are significant differences in parents' sex,family income,children's disability categories and the degrees of disability. Conclusion: The Revised Coping Health Inventory for Parents has high reliability and validity in the parents group of preschool disabled children. It can be used as an ideal tool to investigate the parents' coping styles of preschool children with disabilities.
作者 李静 李丽华
出处 《北京教育学院学报》 2018年第1期14-21,共8页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Education
基金 北京市教育科学"十二五"规划立项课题"关于北京市学前残疾儿童家长亲职需求的干预研究"(DBB14055)
关键词 学前残疾儿童 残疾儿童父母 父母用应对方式量表 心理健康 亲职压力 育儿胜任力 preschool disabled children parents with preschool disabled children The Coping HealthInventory for Parents mental health parenting stress parenting competence
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1李秀央,郭永松,张扬.付出-获得不平衡量表中文版的信度和效度[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(1):25-28. 被引量:71
  • 2[1]Glidden L.M. (1993)What we do not know about families with children who have developmental disabilities: Questionnaire on resource and stress as a case study. American Journal of Mental Retardation, Vol.97,481-495.
  • 3[3]Beckman, P.J. (1991). Comparison of mother' and father' perception of the effect of young children with and without disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation. Vol. 95,585 -595.
  • 4[6]Seligman, M. and Darling , R.B. (1989) Ordinary Families, Special Children. A system Approach to Childhood Disability. New York :Guilford
  • 5[8]Roach M. A., Orsmond G. I., Barratt M. S.(1999) Mothers and fathers of children with Down syndrome: parental stress and involvement in childcare. American Journal on Mental Retardation, Vol. 104,422 - 436.
  • 6AmericanAssociationonMentalRetardation.MentalRetardation:Defintion,classification,andsystemofsupports(9thed.).AmericanAssociationonMentalRetardation,1992:10-19
  • 7HuangWH.CorrelatesofstresslevelinChinesemotherofachildwithmentalretardation.InternationalJournalofRehabilitationResearch,1998;21:1-4
  • 8安明河等.我校弱智儿童少年家庭教育的调查和思考[J].中国特殊教育,1996,3:20-23.
  • 9陈明聪 王天苗.台北市国立小启智班学生父母参与之研究[J].台湾:特殊教育学刊,1997,15:215-235.
  • 10沈敏等.弱智学生和普通学生家庭情况的对比研究.上海市弱智教育二十年论文专集,1999:303-309

共引文献239

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部