期刊文献+

从“孤独的欣赏者”到“狂热的参加者”——“网络迷群”的文化实践和文化意义

From "Lonely Admirers" to "Fanatical Participants" :Cultural Practice and Cultural Significance of "Internet Fan Groups"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 互联网催生了"网络迷群"这一新群体,也推动迷的研究从个体视角转向群体视角。网络迷群的文化实践区别于传统的"迷——迷客体"的单向行动模式,呈现出新的文化样态。本文择取"偶像崇拜"这一典型的迷行为作为参照点,以"百度发吧"为个案,借助于迷民族志和自我民族志的研究取径,发现聚集于网络空间的网络迷群具有集体狂热、反哺媒介及空间重构的行动特质。解读网络迷群的文化实践,具有深刻的社会学意义。 The Internet has spawned a new group of "Internetfans" and also promoted the study of fans transforming from anindividual point of view to a group point of view. The culturalpractice of Internet fans is different from the traditional one-waymode, showing a new cultural pattern. In this paper, we take "idolworship" as a typical reference point, taking "Baidu Fa Ba" asacase, with the help of the research on the group journal of fansand group journal of individuals, trying to find such traits of In-ternet fan groups as collective fanaticism, regurgitation feeding ofmedia and space reconstruction. It is of profound sociologicalsignificance to interpret the cultural practice of Internet fangroups.
作者 张旭东
机构地区 河南文理学院
出处 《科教文汇》 2018年第8期168-169,共2页 Journal of Science and Education
关键词 迷文化 网络迷群 文化实践 迷民族志 自我民族志 fan culture Internet fan groups cultural practice group journal of fans group journal of individuals
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献46

  • 1[美]艾利丝和博克纳:《作为主体的研究者:自我的民族志、个体叙事、自反性》,载[美]邓津和林肯:《定性研究(第3卷):经验资料收集与分析的方法》,风笑天等译,重庆大学出版社2007年版,第777-822页.
  • 2[美]劳伦斯·纽曼:《社会研究方法:定性和定量的取向(第五版)》,郝大海译,中国人民大学出版社2007年版,第114~115页.
  • 3Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membershiproles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 4Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). ReflexiveMethodologies : Interpretation and Research. London, Sage.
  • 5Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn in a blind al-ley? Qualitative Health Research ,7:325 -344.
  • 6Bochner, A. P. (2001). Narrative's virtues. Quali-tative Inquiry, 7(2), 131 - 157.
  • 7Bochner, A. P. & Ellis, C. S. (2006). Communi-cation as Autoethnography. In G. J. Sheperd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.). Communication as Perspectives on Theory. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage, pp. 110- 122.
  • 8Boehner, A. P. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann- Healy,L. (1997). Relationships as stories, in S. Duck (ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and in- terventions (2nd ed. ). New York: John Wiley, pp. 307 - 324.
  • 9Boehner, A. P. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann -Healy,L. (1998). Mucking around looking for truth. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter ( Eds. ). Dialectical approach to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erl- baum, pp. 41- 62.
  • 10Bruce, T. (2000) Never let the bastards see youcry, Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 69-74.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部