期刊文献+

模式创新:如何监督制约监察委员会——基于传统与新型监督模式对比的视角 被引量:5

Probe into the Supervision Mode of Commission of Supervision——Based on the Comparison of Conventional and New Supervision Modes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 监察委员会是"位高权重"的国家权力单元,亟待监督制约。在此有两种监督模式可供选择,一种是传统监督模式:人大监督、司法监督、执政党监督以及人民监督员的监督;另一种是新型监督模式:于人大内部设立专门监督委员会、于监察委员会内部设立调查委员会、建立监察诉讼制度以及建立新型上级监督机制。通过对历史实践的经验总结以及监察体制改革趋势的分析,发现传统的监督模式已很难胜任对监察委员会的监督工作,相比之下新型监督模式的监督更加实效有力,更加符合法治运行规律。 The Commission of Supervision is a unit of state power with “a high degree of weight”and is in urgent need of su-pervision and restriction. Two options are provided for the supervision: one being conventional, supervision by the people’ scongress, judicial supervision, supervision by the ruling party and by the people’s supervisors. The other isa new mode: theestablishment of a special oversight committee within the NPC, the establishment of a commission of inquiry within the supervi-sion commission, the establishment of a system of supervision and litigation, and the establishment of a new type of supervisorymechanism. Based on experience from historical practice and the analysis of trends in the supervision system reform, the tradi-tional supervision model is caught in some difficulties to supervise the supervision commission. In contrast, the new supervisionmode is more effective and more in line with the rule of law, ultimately conducive to the inclusion of Supervision Commissioninto the orbit of law.
作者 周智博
出处 《廉政文化研究》 2018年第1期9-16,共8页 Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
关键词 监察委员会 监督制约 专门监督委员会 内部调查委员会 Supervision Committee supervision and control specialized committee for supervision internal investigation com-mittee
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

共引文献351

同被引文献87

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部