专利侵权不停止实证探究——基于2016年专利司法解释(二)第26条的思考

Empirical Study on Non-Cessation of Patent Infringement——Think About the Article 26 of the Judicial Interpretation of Patent(Second)

2016年专利司法解释(二)第26条确立起专利侵权不停止制度,实现了停止侵害适用限制的重大突破。该法条衍生出专利侵权不停止适用范围、公共利益的界定依据、合理费用的确定等三大焦点问题。以26个案例为样本,分析总结了专利侵权不停止的适用现状及客观问题。同时,厘清该司法解释涉及侵权不停止问题的第25条与26条的逻辑关系及共同的适用环节。在解读法条和归纳案例的基础上提出了较为可行的建议,以期为进一步的理论研究提供借鉴。

The Article 26 of the Judicial Interpretation of Patent（Second） in 2006 has established the system of non-cessation of patent infringement, and achieved a major breakthrough to the restrictions of the application of cease the infringement.This article derives three major problems, such as the applicable scope of patent infringement, the definition of public interest, the determination of reasonable cost. It takes 26 cases as samples and summarizes the application circumstances and objective problems of noncessation of patent infringement. At the same time, it clarifies the logical relationship between the common application of Article 25 and Article 26, which provides for non-cessation of patent infringement. On the basis of interpreting the law and summarizing the case, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions to provide reference for further theoretical research.