期刊文献+

共刺激分子B7-H3在急性髓系白血病中的表达及生物学意义 被引量:2

Expression of costimulatory molecule B7-H3 on human acute myeloid leukemia and its biological significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检测共刺激分子B7-H3在初诊急性髓系白血病(human acute myeloid leukemia,AML)患者中的表达,探讨其临床意义。方法:应用流式细胞术(FCM)检测66例初诊AML患者原始幼稚细胞群上B7-H3分子膜蛋白的表达,RT-PCR技术检测B7-H3 m RNA产物的表达。分析B7-H3分子的表达与AML患者发病时年龄、性别、初诊时外周血白细胞计数以及染色体之间的关系,评估B7-H3分子的表达与患者的无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)和总体生存期(overall survival,OS)之间的关系。结果:正常对照组B7-H3分子表达阴性。共刺激分子B7-H3在66例初诊AML患者中阳性表达率为42%(28/66)。在不同性别、年龄和白细胞分组中,B7-H3阳性率表达无统计学差异(P=0.924,0.541,0.310);预后差染色体变异组的B7-H3分子的阳性表达率明显高于预后好及中等预后组(P<0.001)。B7-H3分子阳性组患者的PFS(7.4个月vs.15.2个月)及OS(9.8个月vs.17.8个月)均明显低于阴性组患者(P<0.05)。此外,在AML-M2亚型中,预后差染色体变异组B7-H3分子的表达明显高于预后好及中等预后组(30.05%±23.10%vs.10.08%±7.07%,P<0.001),B7-H3与骨髓白血病细胞CD34存在共表达,并且CD34阳性组的B7-H3分子表达明显高于CD34阴性组(20.90%±19.70%vs.9.63%±7.21%,P=0.034)。结论:共刺激分子B7-H3的表达对于AML患者的病情进展有一定影响,B7-H3分子表达阳性的患者预后更差。B7-H3对AML的预后判断和指导临床治疗具有重要意义。 Objective:To analyze the expression of costimulatory molecule B7-H3 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML),and explore the clinical significance of the expression of B7-H3. Methods:The expression of B7-H3 protein was detected by flow cytometry(FCM)and the expression of B7-H3 m RNA was detected by RT-PCR. We analyzed the relationship between the expression of B7-H3 and some clinical factors. We evaluated the progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)between the B7-H3 positive group and the B7-H3 negative group. Results:The results demonstrated that B7-H3 was weakly expressed on bone marrow of AML patients,and RT-PCR also detected m RNA of B7-H3. No B7-H3 positive cells were detected in the normal human bone marrow.B7-H3 was detected in 28 of the 66 cases(42%). However,among 66 AML cases,no significantly higher frequency of B7-H3 positive cases was found in the male or female group(P=0.924). Neither was observed between patients who were older than 60 years and those less than 60 years(P=0.541). The B7-H3 positive expression was of no significant within the higher WBC subset(≥ 30×109/L)(P=0.310). There was significant differences between favorable karyotype subset and unfavorable ones(P0.001). There was also statistical difference in PFS(7.4 mon vs. 15.2 mon)and OS(9.8 mon vs. 17.8 mon)between the B7-H3 positive group and B7-H3 negative group,respectively(P〈0.05). Furthermore,in the AML-M2 subtype,the expression of B7-H3 on the unfavorable karyotype group(8 cases)was higher than the favorable group(29 cases,30.05% ± 23.10% vs. 10.08% ± 7.07%,P0.001). There was coexpression between B7-H3 and CD34 of blast cells. The expression of B7-H3 in the CD34 positive group was higher than that in the negative group(20.90% ± 19.70% vs. 9.63% ± 7.21%,P=0.034). Conclusion:The expression of B7-H3 in AML has relationship with the expression of the karyotype. The B7-H3 positive patients have the worse prognostic. The research of B7-H3 may be a new prognostic marker and provide insights into the leukemogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期54-58,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金(81270652)
关键词 共刺激分子 B7-H3 急性髓系白血病 预后 costimulatory molecule B7-H3 acute myeloid leukemia poor prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1Chang-Ping Wu,Jing-Ting Jiang,Min Tan,Yi-Bei Zhu,Mei Ji,Kuan-Feng Xu,Jie-Min Zhao,Guang-Bo Zhang,Xue-Guang Zhang.Relationship between co-stimulatory molecule B7-H3 expression and gastric carcinoma histology and prognosis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(3):457-459. 被引量:39
  • 2Bretscher P, Cohn M. A theory of self-non-self discrimination. Science, 1970,169(950): 1042-1049.
  • 3Chambers CA, Allison JP. Costimulatory regulation of T cell function. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1999, 11:203-210.
  • 4Liang L, Sha WC. The right place at the right time: Novel B7 family members regulate effector T cell responses. Curr Opin lmmunol, 2002, 14: 384-390.
  • 5Coyle A J, Gutierrez-Ramos JC. The expanding B7 superfamily Increasing complexity in costimulatory signals regulating T cell function. Nat lmrnunol,2001, 2(3): 203-209.
  • 6Henry J, Miller MM, Pontarotti P. Structure and evolution of the extended B7 family, lmmunol Today, 1999, 20(6): 285-288.
  • 7Yoshinaga SK, Whoriskey JS, Khare SD, Sarmiento U, Guo J, Horan T,Shih Get al. T cell co-stimulation through B7RP- 1 and ICOS. Nature, 1999,402:827-832.
  • 8HutloffA, Dittrich AM, Beier KC, Eljaschewitsch B, Kraft R,Anagnostopoulos l, Kroczek RA. ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature, 1999, 397:263-266.
  • 9Freeman G J, Long A J, lwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, Nishimura H, Fitz LJ et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med, 2000,192:1027-1034.
  • 10Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chemova T, Chaudhary D, Borde M, Chemova I,Iwai Y at al. PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD- 1 and inhibits T cell activation.Nat lmmunol, 2001, 2:261-268.

共引文献41

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部