摘要
目的:探究远近配穴与局部取穴治疗肩周炎的临床疗效对比。方法:选取符合标准患有肩周炎的68例患者作为研究对象,严格按照随机原则将其分为对照组与观察组,每组各34例,采用局部取穴对对照组患者进行治疗,而采用远近配穴对观察组患者进行治疗,观察并分析2组患者治疗前后的的VAS评分和DNS评分,以及生活质量指标。结果:2组患者经过治疗,其VAS评分、DNS评分与治疗前相比,均有所下降,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);经过治疗后,与对照组相比,观察组患者的VAS评分和DNS评分下降幅度更为明显,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者经过治疗后与对照组治疗后相比,生活质量更高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:远近配穴比局部取穴更有利于改善肩周炎患者的病情,提高其神经缺损功能与生活质量,效果较为显著,应予以推广使用。
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of far and near acupoints and local acupoints in the treatment of frozen shoulder. Methods: 68 patients with frozen shoulder were enrolled in our hospital. The patients were divided into control group and observation group according to the principle of randomization. The patients in the control group were treated with local acupoints, and the patients in the observation group were treated with the far and near acupoints.The VAS score and the DNS score of the two groups before and after treatment were observed and analyzed,and the quality of life index was observed of life. Result: The VAS score and the DNS score of the two groups were significantly lower than those before the control group(P0.05). After treatment, compared with the control group, the VAS score of the observation group And the decrease of DNS score was more obvious, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). The quality of life was higher and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05) in the observation group after treatment compared with the control group. Conclusion: Far and near points than the local acupoints was more conducive to improve the condition of patients with frozen shoulder, while its role in improving its nerve defect function and quality of life was more significant, should be used to promote.
出处
《中医药临床杂志》
2018年第1期148-150,共3页
Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
远近配穴
局部取穴
肩周炎
Far and near acupoints
Local acupoints
Frozen shoulde
Clinical comparison