行政诉讼管辖制度改革论析

The Theory of Administrative Litigation Jurisdiction System Reform

行政诉讼作为化解行政纠纷特别是官民冲突的重要途径,在处理社会矛盾之际愈感无力。尽管新《行政诉讼法》取得些许成效,而半间半界式的改革实属隔靴搔痒,难以根治行政诉讼顽疾。将取消基层人民法院一审行政案件管辖权、相对集中管辖以及设立行政法院三种改革方案比较视之,无疑设立行政法院更具优越性。在坚持党的领导、人民代表大会制度、司法一元化模式以及人民法院依法独立公正行使审判权的原则下,以司法审判区域与行政管理区域相分离为目标指向,设立受最高人民法院监督与指导且独立于地方的三级行政法院架构,以实现司法权对行政权的有效监督,彰显行政诉讼的应有价值。

Administrative litigation for resolving administrative disputes especially the important way of officials and conflict,the more in dealing with social contradictions feeling weak.Although the new "administrative litigation law"to achieve some success,but the halfway reform effect is not good.It's difficult to treat diseases of the administrative litigation.Compared to cancel the grassroots people's court of first instance jurisdiction over administrative cases,the jurisdiction of the relatively concentrated and establish administrative court three reforms,setting up administrative court more advantages.In adhere to the leadership of the communist party of China,the people's congress system,the judicial unified mode,under fair and exercise their respective powers independently in accordance with the principles of the people's court,by separating the judicial area and administrative area for targets,and set up by the supreme people's court supervision and guidance and is independent of the local architecture level 3administrative court.It can realize the judicial power of the effective supervision of executive power.And indicates that the administrative litigation should be value.