《营造法式》中“挑斡”与“昂桯”及其相关概念辨析

Differentiating Tiaowo and Angting in The Treatise of Construction Methods

从《营造法式》述及挑斡制度存疑的两个概念"昂桯"和"束阑枋"辨析出发,对挑斡再认识。指出既有研究对挑斡与上昂关系分析不够明了,很大程度是因缺少对"昂桯"的应有的认识,以致将"昂桯"误判作挑斡;进而探讨了宋元建筑遗存中挑斡的变异,及其对《法式》中挑斡概念的拓展。

This paper differentiates the cantilever beam（angting） from connecting lintel（shulan fang） as the departure for better understanding tiaowo（cantilever carrying loads above）. It pinpoints that the inadequate study of existing literature on the relation between tiaowo and shang＇ang（upper cantilever） result s from lack of research on angting usually mistaken for tiaowo. It also examines the variations of tiaowo in remaining buildings of Song and Yuan dynasties and the extended conceptions of tiaowo in ＂The Treatise of Construction Methods＂（Yingzaofashi）.