期刊文献+

谱分析与时程分析在抗震设计中的一致性研究

Consistency Study of Spectrum and Time-History Analysis in Anti-Seismic Design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对高耸结构抗震设计方法的选择问题,运用目前抗震计算方法中最具代表性的反应谱法与时程分析法,结合《建筑抗震设计规范》的基本要求,以塔式立体车库结构为研究对象,通过ANSYS有限元分析进行两种方法下位移、应力与层间位移角的计算并对其结果进行对比。结果表明,两种方法对车库抗震分析得到的结果数值相对误差在10%以内,满足实际要求,验证了两种方法在抗震设计中的一致性,为其在结构抗震设计中的应用提供了重要的理论支持与实际指导。 To solve the problem of selection of anti-seismic(AS)design method of high-rise structures,based on"Code for Seismic Design of Buildings",taking tower parking space as a research object,this paper calculated the displacement,stress and inter-story displacement angle with finite element method by software ANSYS and comparatively analysed the results by using two typical methods:response spectrum as well as time analysis.The result shows that both of the relative error of the numerical results among AS analysis for parking space by the two methods are within 10%,which meets the practical requirement.Hence it verifies the consistency within the two methods in the design,so that it provides an important theoretical support and practical guidance for the applications of the two methods in AS design of structures.
作者 安昆
出处 《机械工程与自动化》 2018年第1期27-29,32,共4页 Mechanical Engineering & Automation
关键词 抗震分析 塔式立体车库 反应谱法 时程分析法 层间位移角 anti-seismic analysis tower space parking response spectrum method time analysis method inter-story displacement angle
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1张春霞,李昌铸,卢铁瑞,白红英.现行桥梁抗震设计的反应谱分析方法[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2008,4(9):8-10. 被引量:8
  • 2翟长海,谢礼立.抗震结构最不利设计地震动研究[J].土木工程学报,2005,38(12):51-58. 被引量:49
  • 3中国建筑科学研究院.建筑抗震设计规范(GB/50011-2001)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
  • 4The buildln~ standard law of Japan [ S ]. 4th Edition. Tokyo: The Building Center of Japan, 2004.
  • 5ATC-63 Quantification of building seismic performance factors [ S ]. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council, 2008.
  • 6ASCE/SEI 7---05 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures [ S ]. Reston : American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005.
  • 7Bazzurro P, Cornell C A. Disaggregation of seismic hazard [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1999, 89(2): 501-520.
  • 8FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC: FederalEmergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 9NZS 1170. 5 Structural design actions [ S]. Wellington, New Zealand: Standards New Zealand, 2004.
  • 10Bazzurro P, Cornell C A, Shome N, et al. Three proposals for characterizing MDOF nonlinear seismic response [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1998, 124 ( 11 ) : 1281-1289.

共引文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部