期刊文献+

两种暂封材料冠方封闭能力的体外对比研究

Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Temporary Restorative Materials on Coronal Sealing Capability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的体式显微镜下观察两种暂封材料的染料渗入情况,评价暂封材料的冠方封闭能力。方法收集近期拔除的人离体牙40颗;开髓并建立直线通路后,随机均分为两组,分别用富士Ⅱ玻璃离子水门汀(Fuji Ⅱ)及新型光固化充填玻璃离子(Lonolux Handmisch)暂时封闭窝洞,放入37℃恒温水浴箱24 h,然后浸入1%亚甲基蓝染色剂中7 d,用慢机金刚砂片顺牙长轴近远中方向劈成两半,在体式显微镜下观察染料的渗入情况。结果两种暂封材料染料的渗入情况不尽相同,P<0.05;其差异有统计学意义。结论两种暂封材料相比,新型光固化充填玻璃离子的冠方封闭能力比较好。 Objective Observing the coronal dye penetration of two kinds of temporary restorative materials under the stereomicroscope to assess their coronal sealing capability. Method 40 extracted teeth were collected within a mouth. After endodontic treatment, they were randomly divided into two experimental groups which were temporarily filled by Fuji ⅡGIC and Lonolux Handmisch.Reserving in the constant Temperature water of 37℃ for 24 hours, and the specimens were soaked in 1%Methylene Blue for 7 days at room temperature. Then the specimens were cut mesiodistally into two pieces with carborundum disc. Finally observing the degree of dye penetration under the stereomicroscope. Result The dye penetration of two kinds of temporary materials was notthe same degree, P〈0.05;and there were significant differences between two groups. Conclusion Comparing two kinds of temporary materials, the coronal sealing capability of Lonolux Handmisch is more effective.
出处 《新疆医学》 2017年第12期1426-1428,共3页 Xinjiang Medical Journal
关键词 暂封材料 微渗漏 染料渗透法 Temporary material Microleakage Dye-penetration
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献95

  • 1李建红,金英淑.粘接剂在固定义齿修复中的临床比较[J].天津医科大学学报,2000,6(4):458-459. 被引量:1
  • 2白莲,张成飞,王晓灵,王欢.五种髓腔暂封材料冠方微渗漏的体外评价[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2005,21(7):423-425. 被引量:9
  • 3郑佑祥,范兵.不同类别暂封材料封闭效果的研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2006,22(6):691-693. 被引量:7
  • 4Deveaux E,Hildelbert P,Neut C,et al.Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, TERM, and Fermit: a 21-day in Vitro study[J].J Endod,1999,25 (10):653-659.
  • 5Davidovich E,Weiss E,Fuks AB,et al.Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment[J].J Am Dent Assoc,2007,138 (10) :1347-1352.
  • 6Ferrari M,Vichi A,Mannocci F,et al.Sealing ability of two "compomers" applied with and without phosphoric acid treatment for Class V restorations in vivo[J].J Prosthet Dent,1998,79(2): 131-135.
  • 7Wiegand A,Buchalla W,Attin T.Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation[J].Dent Mater, 2007,23 (3) :343-362.
  • 8Deveaux E,Hildelbert P,Neut C,et al.Bacterial microleakage of Cavit,IRM,and TERM.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1992,74(5):634-643.
  • 9Koagel SO,Mines P,Apicella M,et al.In vitro study to compare the corona microleakage of Tempit UltraF,Tempit,IRM,and Cavit by using the fluid transport model.J Endod,2008,34(4):442-444.
  • 10Cruz EV,Shigetani Y,Ishikawa K,et al.A laboratory study of coronal microleakage using four temporary restorative materials.Int Endod J,2002,35(4):315-320.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部