期刊文献+

高中英语与大学英语教材衔接研究——概念语法隐喻视角 被引量:2

Connection of EFL Textbooks for High School Students and University Students——Perspective of Ideational Grammatical Metaphors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概念语法隐喻是决定语篇难度的因素之一,也是书面语篇的核心特征。文章从概念语法隐喻视角出发,以人教版高中英语教材和外教社全新版大学英语综合教程为例,对高中英语与大学英语教材的衔接情况进行研究。研究发现,从概念语法隐喻的角度看,高中英语和大学英语教学衔接情况较好。总体来看,概念语法隐喻的出现频率呈上升趋势,但不是线性上升趋势。因此,教材在语篇选择和改编上还有改进的空间。教材编写人员在选择语篇时需要把概念语法隐喻考虑在内,使概念语法隐喻的出现频率呈线性上升趋势,衔接得更好。 Ideational grammatical metaphors are not only one of the factors deciding the difficulty of texts, but the key characteristic of texts as well. The paper attempts to study the connection of EFL textbooks for high school students and university students in China in terms of ideational grammatical metaphor, taking New Senior English for China published by People's Education Press and New College English Integrate Course published by Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press for example. It is found that in terms of ideational grammatical metaphors, the EFL textbooks for High School Students and University Students are well connected;the frequency of grammatical metaphors has an increase tendency, but not a linear increase. That means the selection and adaptation of text for EFL textbooks can still be improved. Textbook compilers shall take grammatical metaphor into consideration when they select and adapt passages to make these two sets of textbooks are better connected.
出处 《吉林省教育学院学报》 2018年第1期105-109,共5页 Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education
基金 浙江省教育科学规划课题"高中英语与大学英语教材衔接研究--概念语法隐喻视角"(编号:2016SCG127) 浙江省高等学校国内访问学者专业发展项目"高中英语与大学英语教材衔接研究--概念流利视角"(编号:GNFX201503)
关键词 英语教材 衔接 概念语法隐喻 EFL textbook connection ideational grammatical metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1熊学亮,刘东虹.英语学习中语法隐喻的迁移[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(2):100-105. 被引量:85
  • 2肖礼全.对中国英语教学宏观模式的思考[J].外语教学,2005,26(5):35-42. 被引量:76
  • 3董亚芬.《大学英语》系列教材第二次修订的思考与设想[J].外语界,2006(1):77-79. 被引量:31
  • 4庄智象.构建具有中国特色的外语教材编写和评价体系[J].外语界,2006(6):49-56. 被引量:146
  • 5Eggins, S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics [ M ]. London : Longman, 2004.
  • 6Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H. Y. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy & Complexity [ M ]. Hawaii : Hawaii University Press, 1998.
  • 7Matthiessen, C. Interpreting the textual meta - function [ M ]// In M. Davies & L. Ravelli ( eds. ) Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice (pp37 -81). London: Pinter, 1992.
  • 8Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J.R. Writing Science : Literacy and Discursive Power[ M]. London: Falmer Press, 1993.
  • 9Ravelli, L. Renewal of Connection : Integrating Theory and practice in an understanding of grammatical metaphor[M]// In A. M. Simon- Vandenbergen, M. Tavemiers & L. Ravelli (eds.) Gram-matical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics ( pp37 - 64). Amsterdam / Philadephia : John Benjamins, 2003.
  • 10Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[ M]. London : Edward and Arnold, 2000.

共引文献191

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部