摘要
将2016年2—7月在宣武医院皮肤科门诊就诊的51例面部脂溢性皮炎患者,按就诊顺序号单数者为试验组(28例)、双数者为对照组(23例)分组,分别给予透明质酸凝胶和他克莫司软膏治疗28 d。每次随访行问卷调查评价药物疗效,同时使用VISIA皮肤图像分析仪对患者的皮肤指标进行定量分析。治疗后,试验组和对照组有效率分别为89%(25/28)和91%(21/23),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);VISIA结果显示与治疗前相比,两组患者斑点、红色区特征计数减少,差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05),两组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。试验组无不良反应发生,对照组3例在用药第2天出现皮肤瘙痒伴有烧灼感,继续用药后症状逐渐消失。提示透明质酸凝胶治疗面部脂溢性皮炎的疗效与他克莫司软膏相当,且安全无刺激性;VISIA皮肤图像分析仪可为脂溢性皮炎提供客观、有效的定量评价方法。
Fifty one female outpatients with facial seborrheic dermatitis attending in Xuanwu Hospital during February 2016 to July 2016 were randomly assigned in two groups: 28 patients were treated with hyaluronic acid gel ( study group) and 23 patients were treated with tacrolimus ointment ( control group) for 28 days. The improvement of symptoms after treatment was observed by a questionnaire, and VISIA was used to quantify the skin index of the patients. There was no difference in the therapeutic effect between the study group and control group after 28 days ( P 〉 0.05 ). The facial spots and red areas were decreased in both groups, compared to those before treatment (P 〈 0.05). The results indicate that hyaluronic acid gel is safe, non-irritating and effective in treatment of seborrheic dermatitis, and VISIA provides an objective and effective method for assessing the skin lesions seborrheic dermatitis.
出处
《中华全科医师杂志》
2018年第3期213-215,共3页
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
关键词
皮炎
脂溢性
凝胶类
透明质酸
他克莫司
Dermatitis, seborrheic
Gels, hyaluronic acid
Tacrolimus