期刊文献+

规范化培训的麻醉住院医师超声定性胃内容物学习曲线的建立 被引量:4

The construction of standardized training resident' learning curves for qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨建立住院医师规范化培训的超声定性胃内容物的学习曲线,确定掌握该技术所需的最少操作例数,为培训课程开发、实践培训和指导教师的客观评估提供参考依据.方法 对10名在浙江省人民医院麻醉科接受规范化培训的住院医师进行教学培训,包括讲座和胃超声人体模拟培训.讲座内容包括文献浏览、胃超声操作具体方法和图像介绍.住院医师分2组,每组5人,共进行6轮操作培训.每名住院医师依次进行超声操作评估并记录每次超声评估结果,每名医师共进行30次超声操作评估.使用随机数字表法随机将志愿者分为空腹组、液体组和固体组,使用累积和方法及曲线拟合构建学习曲线预测模型.结果 参加规范化培训的住院医师超声定性胃内容物总正确率为70.7%(212/300),超声空腹组总正确率只有59.0%(59/100),超声液体组和固体组的正确率分别为74.0%(74/100)和79.0%(79/100);相比空腹组,超声固体组的正确率更高(P<0.05).虽然10名住院医师个人学习曲线均超过可接受失败率10%,但是还在不可接受失败率30.0%以内.结论 学习曲线和预测模型不但可以评价住院医师达到学习目标的培训过程,还可以评估新规范化培训项目建立的可行性.经过24次和28次超声操作后,住院医师超声定性胃内容物正确率分别达到90.0%和95.0%,但所需要培训次数较多和培训周期较长,需要进一步确立更方便有效的培训方法. Objective This study aimed to investigate the construction of standardized training resident'learning curves for qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content and to determine the amount of training a resident would need to achieve competence in the ultrasound technique,so as to provide the reference basis for the training course development,the practice training and formulating the criterion of the qualifications to practice the ultrasound assessment of gastric content.Methods Ten residents underwent a teaching intervention including lectures and an workshop on live models of ultrasound assessment of gastric content.Lectures include reading articles,picture library,and how to perform a systematic qualitative assessment.Ten residents were divided into two groups and five residents were scheduled six training practice per group.Five volunteers were randomly assigned to five different operating areas at training practice.Each resident performed ultrasound sequentially and the results were recorded.Every resident assessed 30 separate sets of data and the results were recorded randomization allocation with random number method was conducted by an independent nurse into "empty" group,"clear fluid" group and "solid" group,with ten cases per group.Use the accrual and method to construct an individual learning curve;then learning curves and a predictive model were constructed through the cumulative sum method and nonlinear regression.Results The overall correct diagnosis rate of qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content was 70.7% (212/300) in the standardized training of the anesthesia department.The overall correct diagnosis rate was 59% (59/100) in the "empty" group,and was 74% (74/100) and 79% (79/100) in the "clear fluid" group and the "solid" group respectively.When comparing to "empty" group,the "solid" group showed a significantly higher failure rate (P〈0.05).Although the learning curves of the five standardized training residents exceeded the acceptable failure rate of 10%,they were still beyond the cutoff point of unacceptable failure rate of less than 30%.The average number of cases required to achieve 90% and 95% success rates was estimated to be 24 and 28,respectively.Conclusions The learning curve and the predict model could not only evaluate the training process of achieving the learning objectives,but also assess the feasibility of establishing a new standardized training program.This study suggests that 24 and 28 are the average numbers of cases required to achieve 90% and 95% correct rates of qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content respectively.As the required number and the long cycle of training,a more convenient and effective training method is needed to be established.
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2018年第1期107-111,133,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基金 浙江省医药卫生一般研究计划B类项目(2013KYB244)
关键词 学习曲线 超声检查 胃内容物 住院医师 培训 Learning curve Ultrasonography Gastric content Resident Training
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1钱锋,孙刚,唐波,王自强,石彦,赵永亮,罗华星,余佩武.腹腔镜胃癌根治手术的学习曲线[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(6):510-512. 被引量:46
  • 2吴恺明,陈剑辉,马晋平,蔡世荣.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的学习曲线研究[J].消化肿瘤杂志(电子版),2010,2(2):112-114. 被引量:9
  • 3李国新,闫鸿涛,余江,雷尚通,薛琪,程侠.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的学习曲线[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(4):535-538. 被引量:41
  • 4Joshi S, Sciacca RR, Solanki DR, et al. A prospective evuation of clinical tests for placement of laryngeal mask airways. Anesthesiolo-gy,1998,89(5):1141-1146.
  • 5Campbell RL, Biddle C, Assudmi N. Fiberoptic assessment of laryn- geal mask airway placement: blind insertion versus direct visual epi- glottoscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004,62 (9) : 1108-1113.
  • 6Chandan SN, Sharma SM, Raveendra US, et al. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement : a comparison of blind insertion and insertion with the use of a laryngoscope. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2009,8 (2) : 95-98.
  • 7Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Habli N, et al. Ultrasound confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement correlates with fiberopti- clmyngoscope findings. Middle East J Anesthesiol, 2011,21 (2) : 283-287.
  • 8Sustic A, Protic A, Cicvaric T,et al. The addition of a brief ultra- sound examination to clinical assessment increases the ability to con- firm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes. J Clin Anestb, 2010,22(4) :246-249.
  • 9Chou HC,Tseng WP,Wang CH, et al. Tracheal rapid uhrasound ex- am (T. R. U. E) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation, 2011,82(10) : 1279-1284.
  • 10Keller C, Bfimacombe JR, Keller K, et al. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth,1999,82(2):286-287.

共引文献25

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部