期刊文献+

数学集体教学活动中教师数学语言的运用:价值、现状与对策 被引量:1

The Application of Mathematical Languages in Collective Math Teaching Activity: Value, Current Situation and Countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 数学语言在帮助幼儿理解数学概念、引导幼儿在程序性知识与概念性知识之间建立连接、促进幼儿数学思维发展等方面有着非常重要的作用。当下,数学集体教学活动中教师的数学语言存在忽视核心经验,语言内容贫乏,表征形式单一,交流形式不当等问题。基于数学语言的内涵及幼儿数学学习的特点,研究者认为,教师应当认真研习数学核心经验,运用精确、富有逻辑性并能体现数学之美的语言;选择易于幼儿理解的有一定开放程度的数学语言;运用内容丰富、形式多样的数学语言;创设宽松氛围,与幼儿进行深入的数学语言交流;努力做到数学语言学习与数学操作学习并重,为幼儿提供高效的支持与引导。 Mathematical languages play an important role in helping children understand mathematical concepts, guiding them to establish a connection between procedural knowledge and conceptual knowledge, and cultivating their mathematical think- ing. However, there are many problems in the use of mathematical languages such as ignoring the mathematical core experi- ence, lack of content, single forms of presentation, and inappropriate way of communication. Based on the connotation of the mathematical languages and features of children's mathematics learning, the researchers suggest that teachers should study the core experience, use precise and logical mathematical languages which are easier for children to understand. It is also important to create a stress free environment for children to communicate in mathematical languages. Both mathematical languages learn- ing and mathematical operation learning should be valued to support children's mathematics learning.
出处 《幼儿教育(教育科学)》 2018年第1期21-25,共5页 Early Childhood Education(Educational Sciences)
基金 浙江省2014年度哲学社会科学规划课题“浙江省幼儿园游戏活动质量的测查研究”(课题编号:14NDJC223YB) 浙江师范大学教育学一级学科基地2015年立项研究生课题“数学集体教学活动中教师数学语言运用的研究”(课题编号:JXYSSS2015039)的研究成果之一
关键词 数学 集体教学活动 数学语言 幼儿 mathematics collective teaching activity mathematical languages children
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1邵光华.数学课堂阅读指导策略[J].课程.教材.教法,1998,18(3):24-26. 被引量:39
  • 2张国平.数学语言与数学语言教学[J].池州师专学报,2006,20(3):98-99. 被引量:10
  • 3王新兵,杨世明.数学课堂教学设计初探[J].数学教育学报,1996,5(2):29-34. 被引量:6
  • 4Schnotz,W. (2002). Commentary. Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays [J]. Educational Psychology Review, 14 ( 1 ) : 101-120.
  • 5Chnotz,W&Bannert, M . (2003). Costruction and interference in learning from multiple representation [ J ]. Learning and Instuction, 13(2):141-156.
  • 6Schnotz, W. (1993). On the relation of dual coding and mental models in graphics comprehension[J]. Learning and Instruction, 20(3) ,247 - 249.
  • 7李士铃.PME:数学教育心理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001:22-23.
  • 8Lesh. R, Post. T, &Behr. M. ( 1987 ). Representation and translation among representation in mathematics learning and problem mlving. In C. Janvier(Ed. ), Problem of representation in teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33 - 40 ) [ M ]. Hillsdale, NI : Erlbaum.
  • 9Janvier, C. Representation and Understanding. (1987) [ M ]. The Notion of Function as an Exanlple. Problems of Representation in the Teaching and learning of Mathematics . Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale,NJ,67-71.
  • 10Keller, B. A, &Hirseh, C. R, ( 1998 ). Student Preferences for representations of Functions [ J ]. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science &Technology, 29(1) : 1 - 17.

共引文献169

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部