基于共同题非等组设计的等值结果评价标准研究综述

A Review of Evaluation Criteria of Equating Results for the Common Item Nonequivalent Groups Design

国内外关于等值结果的评价标准尚无统一的认识。本文以共同题非等组设计为例,根据评价对象的不同,将等值结果的评价标准划分为两种类型:一类是用于评价等值分数的标准,一类是用于评价等值参数的标准。本文通过对两类等值结果的评价标准进行对比和梳理,提出了不同等值结果评价标准的适用范围及其局限性,以期为研究者今后选用合理的等值结果评价标准提供参考。

There is no unified understanding about the evaluation standards of equivalence results. According to different evaluation objects, we divide the evaluation criteria of equivalence results into two types based on the common item nonequivalent groups design. One is the standard that used to evaluate the equivalent score, and the other is the criterion used to evaluate the equivalent parameters. We put forward the application scope and limitation of different evaluation standards by comparing the two types of evaluation criteria of equating. We hope that this review will provide a reference for future researchers to choose reasonable evaluation criteria for equating results.