摘要
称谓语的语义语用变化意味着汉语词汇系统的发展,也标记了社会的发展,对比称谓语的变化可以有效地揭示称谓语的标示作用。但历来称谓语的历史对比分析都建立在对书面语料处理的基础上,而"历史对比/自由联想法",通过对比不同年代自由联想实验所得的数据,可从另一视角进行有效分析。当年"小姐"称谓语发展的矛盾性引得争议无数,我们根据2005年与2015年的自由联想测试,分析该称谓语的变化,回应了学者们的预判。
The semantic and pragmatic changes of address terms mark the development of Chinese vocabulary system as well as the development of the society,and a comparison of the changes of address terms is conducive to studies of such developments.Since previous historical contrast analyses were based on written materials,the paper attempts to adopt the historical contrast/free association method to further discuss the issue from a different perspective using the data obtained from free association experiments. The contradiction in the development of the address term "Xiao Jie"aroused heated debates in the 90 s and early 21 stcentury,and we reanalyze the changes of the address term based on the two free association experiments in 2005 and 2015,giving responses to the previous predictions and prejudgments.
出处
《语言文字应用》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期129-135,共7页
Applied Linguistics
关键词
小姐
称谓语
自由联想
历史对比
社会语言学实验
Xiao Jie
address term
free association
historical contrast
sociolinguistie experiment