摘要
目的通过比较听力损失儿童倍频程CEChirp听性脑干反应(ABR)反应阈与行为测听阈值的结果差异,探讨倍频程CE-Chirp ABR临床应用的价值。方法选择21例(共40耳)听力损失儿童,在安静环境下分别测试裸耳倍频程CE-Chirp ABR反应阈与行为测听听阈,将两种不同的测试方法的测试结果进行比较。结果听力损失儿童倍频程CE-Chirp ABR反应阈与行为测听阈值结果进行统计分析,各频率相关系数r分别为0.693、0.830、0.836和0.845,P均<0.05。结论两种测试方法存在较好的相关性,倍频程CE-Chirp ABR作为一种客观测听技术,对听力损失儿童客观反应具有良好的稳定性和可靠性,能够较好的反映听力水平。
OBJECTIVE To compare the difference of octave band CE-Chirp ABR response threshold and behavioral auditory thresholds in children with hearing loss, and to explore the clinical value of octave band CEChirp ABR. METHODS Twenty-one children（40 ears）with hearing loss were selected. The octave band CEChirp ABR response threshold and behavioral auditory hearing threshold were measured in quiet environment.The results of two different test methods were compared.RESULTS The frequencies of octave band CE-Chirp ABR response thresholds and behavioral auditory thresholds were statistically analyzed. The correlation coefficients at different frequencies were 0.693, 0.830, 0.836 and 0.845, respectively,and the P values were 0.05. CONCLUSION There is good correlation between octave band CE-Chirp ABR response and behavioral auditory hearing measurement. Octave band CE-Chirp ABR, as an objective audiometry technique, has good stability and reliability for the objective response of hearing loss, and can better reflect the hearing level.
出处
《中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科》
CSCD
2018年第2期83-85,共3页
Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
关键词
儿童
听觉丧失
听阈
听力检查
诱发电位
听觉
脑干
Child
Hearing Loss
Auditory Threshold
Hearing Tests
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
