期刊文献+

不同交叉角度下的交叉跑道碰撞风险评估 被引量:3

Intersecting Runways Collision Risk Assessment Based on Different Intersection Angles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 交叉跑道能灵活地面对强侧风的影响,从而提高机场的效率和通行能力。通过分析交叉跑道运行的特点,将交叉点作为冲突点进行模型研究,建立基于冲突点的碰撞风险区,构建基于冲突点的交叉跑道碰撞风险模型,并分别对地面与空中两种运行情况下的碰撞风险进行评估。算例结果表明:当交叉角为90°时,3种运行模式下的碰撞风险均小于规定的安全目标水平,当改变交叉角度进行分析,随着交叉角范围从15°~90°变化时,交叉跑道碰撞风险值随着夹角的增加,在30°时碰撞风险值达到最大,随后又减小,当交叉角为75°时碰撞风险达到最小值。 Intersecting runways can flexibly face the impact of strong crosswind,toimprove the capacity and efficiency of the airport. By analyzing the characteristics of intersecting runways operation,take the intersection as a conflict point for model research,established a collision risk zone based on the conflict point,a collision risk model of intersecting runways based on the conflict point is proposed,and the risk of collision both ground and air operations is evaluated. Numerical results prove that when the angle of intersecting runways is 90°,the collision risk under all three operating models are below the level of safety target,when changing the angle of intersecting runways for analysis,as the angle ranges from 15° to 90°,with the increase of intersection angle,the collision risk value of the intersecting runways reaches the maximum at 30°,and then decreases,when the intersection angle is 75°,the collision risk reaches the minimum.
作者 徐超 李欣
出处 《航空计算技术》 2018年第1期74-78,共5页 Aeronautical Computing Technique
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(71701202) 中央高校基本科研业务经费中国民航大学专项项目资助(3122013Z006)
关键词 运行模式 交叉跑道 碰撞风险 冲突点 operation model intersecting runways collision risk conflict point
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘小明,段海林.平面交叉口交通安全评价方法[J].人类工效学,1997,3(1):49-53. 被引量:42
  • 2陈汝龙.无交叉冲突点交通流系统研究[J].公路交通科技,1996,13(3):39-44. 被引量:1
  • 3Waheed Siddiqee.A Mathematical Model for Predicting the Number of Potential Conflict Situations at Intersecting Air Routes[J].Trans.Sci.,1972(7):158-167.
  • 4Dunlay W.J.Analytical Models of Perceived Air Traffic Control Conflicts[J].Trans.Sci.,1975(9):149-164.
  • 5D.A.Hsu,The evaluation of aircraft collision probabilities at intersecting air routes[J].J.of Navigation,1981,34:78-102.
  • 6Rome,H.J.& Kalafus,R,Impact of automatic dependent surveillance and navigation system accuracy on collision risk on intersecting tracks.Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting[M].Santa Barbara,1988,213-222.
  • 7王欣.空中交通中安全间隔问题的初步研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2000.
  • 8Mayo,P.(1995).Development of proposals for amendment of the PANS-RAC (DOC4444) concerning lateral and longitudinal separation minima in the RNP environment[A].ICAO the Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel (RGCSP) WG/A WP/17[C].Gold Coast,1995.
  • 9D.Anderson and X.G.Lin,Collision risk model for a crossing track separation methodology[J].Journal of Navigation,1996,49:337-349.
  • 10Miller R, HUANG Qing-feng. An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system [ C ]//Proceedings of IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. Birmingham, Alabama:IEEE May, 2002: 317- 321.

共引文献28

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部