摘要
在当前推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革背景下,法院审委会的命运再一次徘徊在了迷途:往来于行政和诉讼的边界,穿梭在规范和事实之间。相较于判审不分、权责不清等问题,审委会如何讨论案件更值得关注与研究。其改良应置于庭审中心主义改革背景下,增强司法亲历性、强化庭审功能,坚持让行政归行政,让司法归司法的理念,构建让职权表决、让诉权表意的案件决断机制,以及创新建立起让事实归事实、让法律归法律的可分诉讼制度,有效解决审委会运行的现实性弊端。
In the background of promoting reform of litigation system centered on the trial of the court;thejudicial committee’ s fate once again hovers between the administration and litigation; and shuttles between thenorm and fact. The unclear responsibility compared with the judgment and the way the committee discusses the casedeserve more attention and research. The improvement should center on the trial reform; strengthen judicialexperience and antagonism? and stick to the idea that administration and judicial justice should not be mingledwhen building the case ideographic mechanism for the authority to vote; the right to make decision? in order toestablish innovative litigation system in which facts and law are divided to effectively overcome the present weaknessof operation of the trial committee.
出处
《广东第二师范学院学报》
2018年第1期78-83,共6页
Journal of Guangdong University of Education
关键词
审委会
运行模式
困境
重构
trial committee operation mode
dilemma
reconstruction