期刊文献+

Influence of arsanilic acid, Cu2+, PO43- and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure

Influence of arsanilic acid, Cu2+, PO43- and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure
原文传递
导出
摘要 Arsanilic acid (ASA), copper ion (Cuz +) and phosphate (PO43 ) are widely used as feed additives for pigs. Most of these three supplemented feed additives were excreted in feces and urine Anaerobic 2+ digestion is often used for the management of pig manure. However the interaction ofASA with Cu 3 ' 2+ 3 or P04 on anaerobic &gestlon is still not clear. In thin study, the influence ofASA, Cu , PO4- and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure and the possible mechanisms were investigated. The initial concentrations ofASA, Cu2+ and PO43 were 0.46 mM, 2 mM and 2 mM in the anaerobic digester, respectively. The methanogenesis was severely inhibited in the assays with only ASA addition, only Cu2+ addition and ASA + PO43 addition with the inhibition index of 97.8%, 46.6% 2+ and 82.6%, respectively, but the methanogenesis inhibition in the assay with ASA + Cu addlt on was mitigated with the inhibition index of 39.4%. PO43 had no obvious impacts on the degradation of ASA. However, Cu2+ addition inhibited the degradation of ASA, and mitigated the methanogcnesis inhibition. The existence of ASA would inhibit methanogenesis and generate more toxic inorganic arsenic compounds during anaerobic digestion, implying the limitation of anaerobic digestion for ASA- contaminated animal manure. However, the co-existence of ASA and Cu2+ could mitigate the inhibition. These results could provide useful information for the management of anaerobic digestion of pig manure containing ASA and Cu2+ . Arsanilic acid (ASA), copper ion (Cuz +) and phosphate (PO43 ) are widely used as feed additives for pigs. Most of these three supplemented feed additives were excreted in feces and urine Anaerobic 2+ digestion is often used for the management of pig manure. However the interaction ofASA with Cu 3 ' 2+ 3 or P04 on anaerobic &gestlon is still not clear. In thin study, the influence ofASA, Cu , PO4- and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure and the possible mechanisms were investigated. The initial concentrations ofASA, Cu2+ and PO43 were 0.46 mM, 2 mM and 2 mM in the anaerobic digester, respectively. The methanogenesis was severely inhibited in the assays with only ASA addition, only Cu2+ addition and ASA + PO43 addition with the inhibition index of 97.8%, 46.6% 2+ and 82.6%, respectively, but the methanogenesis inhibition in the assay with ASA + Cu addlt on was mitigated with the inhibition index of 39.4%. PO43 had no obvious impacts on the degradation of ASA. However, Cu2+ addition inhibited the degradation of ASA, and mitigated the methanogcnesis inhibition. The existence of ASA would inhibit methanogenesis and generate more toxic inorganic arsenic compounds during anaerobic digestion, implying the limitation of anaerobic digestion for ASA- contaminated animal manure. However, the co-existence of ASA and Cu2+ could mitigate the inhibition. These results could provide useful information for the management of anaerobic digestion of pig manure containing ASA and Cu2+ .
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2018年第2期89-96,共8页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
关键词 Arsanilic acid (ASA) METHANOGENESIS INHIBITION Copper PhosphateInorganic arsenics Arsanilic acid (ASA) Methanogenesis Inhibition Copper PhosphateInorganic arsenics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1张树清,张夫道,刘秀梅,王玉军,邹绍文,何绪生.规模化养殖畜禽粪主要有害成分测定分析研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):822-829. 被引量:400
  • 2Smedley P L, Kinniburgh D G. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 2002,17(5): 517-568.
  • 3Chowdhury U K, Biswas B K, Chowdhury T R, Samanta G, Mandai B K, Basu G C, Chanda C R, Lodh D, Saha K C, Mukherjee S K, Roy S, Kabir S, Quamruzzaman Q, Chakraborti D. Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000, 108(5): 393-397.
  • 4Anawar H M, Akai J, Mostofa K M G, Safiullah S, Tareq S M. Arsenic poisoning in groundwater: health risk and geochemical sources in Bangladesh. Environment International, 2002, 27(7): 597-604.
  • 5Yan C H. Arsenic distribution in soils. In: Nriagu J 0, ed. Arsenic in the Environment, Part 1: Cycling and Characterization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994, 17-49.
  • 6Luo Z D, Zhang Y M, Ma L, Zhang G Y, He X, Wilson R, Byrd D M, Griffiths J G, Lai S, He L, Grumski K, Lamm S H. Chronic arsenicism and cancer in Inner Mongolia- consequences of well-water arsenic levels greater than 50 ug- L .. 1. In: Abernathy C 0, Calderon R L, Chappell W R, eds. Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects. London: Chapman Hall, 1997, 55-68.
  • 7Stiiben D, Berner Z, Kappes B, Puchelt H. Environmental monitoring of heavy metals and arsenic from Ag-Pb-Zn mining: a case study over two millennia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2001, 70(1-2): 181-200.
  • 8Nordstrom D K. An overview of arsenic mass-poisoning in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. In: Young C, editor. Minor Elements 2000: Processing and Environmental Aspects of As, Sb, Se, Te, and Bi. Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, 2000, 21-30.
  • 9Nordstrom D K, Alpers C N, Ptacek C J, Blowes D W. Negative pH and extremely acidic mine waters from Iron Mountain, California. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(2): 254-258.
  • 10Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard (GB8978-1996). Beijing: Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China, 1996,2-3 (in Chinese).

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部