期刊文献+

治理研究:正本清源 被引量:171

A Study of Governance: Etymological Clarification
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,"治理"一词被广泛运用,其具体含义却少有人深究。通过梳理大量相关文献,本文回溯了"治理"的词源,对其进行了谱系分析,并追问公共管理领域到底是否出现了所谓范式转换。作者认为,过去二三十年主流治理研究基本上是宣扬一种规范性主张,即新自由主义的主张,没有什么扎实的实证性根基,只是一个"空洞的能指",其大行其道的秘密恰恰是因为基本概念含糊不清。然而,"治理"这一概念不应被完全抛弃,而是应当回归本源,形成自己的话语体系。 In recent years,the term"governance"has been widely used,but its precise meaning is seldom examined. By reviewing a large body of related literature,this essay traces the etymology of the term"governance"and conducts a pedigree analysis of it,with a view to finding out whether there really is a so-called paradigm shift in the field of public administration. The author holds to the view that,in the past two or three decades,the mainstream governance literature basically advocated a normative stance,i.e.,the neoliberalism stance. This stance has no solid empirical foundation but is merely a"hollow signifier,"and the secret of its prevalence lies exactly in its ambiguity. That said,the concept of"governance"should not be completely abandoned. Instead,it should return to its origin and develop its own discourse system.
作者 王绍光
出处 《开放时代》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期153-176,共24页 Open Times
关键词 治理 福利国家 新自由主义 governance welfare state neoliberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162.
  • 2Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, 1^st ed. 1965, 2^nd ed. 1971.
  • 3戴维·奥斯本 特德·盖布勒.改革政府-企业精神如何改革着公营部门[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1996..
  • 4奥斯特罗姆,帕克斯,惠特克.公共服务的制度建构[M].上海:上海三联书店,2000.
  • 5国家行政学院国际合作交流部.西方国家行政改革述评[C].北京:国家行政学院出版社,1998.11.
  • 6亚里斯多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印刷馆,1983.(48).
  • 7埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物的治理之道[M].上海:上海三联书店,2000:18.

共引文献192

同被引文献2818

二级引证文献1883

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部