期刊文献+

Male competition and speciation: expanding our framework for speciation by sexual selection

Male competition and speciation: expanding our framework for speciation by sexual selection
原文传递
导出
摘要 IntroductionSexual selection is a powerful source of rapid evolutionary change, and there is a long-standing hypothesis that it can cause reproductive isolation. However, our understanding of speciation by sexual selection is largely limited to mechanisms by which sexual selection via female mate choice can drive divergence (i.e., when male mating signals and female preferences for those signals diversify; Panhuis et al. 2001; Maan and Seehausen 2011). Male competition for mates--Darwin's second mechanism of sexual selection-can also favor rapid and dramatic phenotypic and genotypic changes, yet it has been all but overlooked in speciation research (Darwin 1859, 1871; Seehausen and Schluter 2004;
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第1期69-73,共5页 动物学报(英文版)
基金 The invitation to guest edit this special column resulted from a symposium co-organized by ACRL, MDM, and RMT at the 2016 congress of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology, and travel expenses for all authors were supported in part by the National Science Foundation (IOS- 1637252). While guest editing this special column, ACRL was supported by NSF (DEB-1638997) and the Watershed Studies Institute at Murray State University. RMT was supported by NSF (IOS-1601531) and the University of Denver's Office of the Associate Provost of Research.
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献158

  • 1Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A, 1994. Male coloration and species recognition in sympatric flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 256: 113-118.
  • 2Alcock J, 1987. The effects of experimental manipulation of re- sources on the behavior of two calopterygid damselflies that exhibit resource~tefense polygyny. Can. J. Zool.-Rev. Canad. De Zool. 65: 2475-2482.
  • 3Anderson CN, Grether GF, 2010. Interspecific aggression and character displacement of competitor recognition in Hetaerina damselflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 277: 549-555.
  • 4Andersson M, 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 5Arnqvist G, Rowe L, 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
  • 6Arnqvist G, Rowe L, 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 7Bateson PPG, 1966. The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biol. Rev. 41: 177-220.
  • 8Berenbaum M, 1983. Coumarins and caterpillars: A case for co- evolution. Evolution 37: 163-179.
  • 9Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A, 1996. Armaments and orna- ments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 385-399.
  • 10Birkhead TR, Martinez JG, Burke T, Froman DP, 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266: 1759-1764.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部