摘要
国家机关"法不禁止皆可为"之说违背宪法学常识,造成诸多后续认识问题。国家机关"法无授权不可为",是不可动摇的宪法原则和宪法学基本常识。做宪法学研究须遵守学术规范、遵循职业逻辑。"不赞成轻易修宪"的观点本身有道理,但应该将相关主张中的刚性需求和柔性需求区别开来,分别对待。
The saying that "absence of legal prohibition means freedom to state organs" violates the common sense of Constitutional Law, and causes a lot of probiems. "Absence of authorization from law meansforbidden for the state organs" is an unshakable Constitutional Principle and basic knowledge of Constitutional Law.The study of constitutional law should follow the academic norms and follow the professional logic.h is reasonable to disapprove of the idea that the constitution could be a mended easily, but it should be separated from the rigid demand and flexible demand in the relevant propositions.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期20-33,共14页
Law Review
基金
2014年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“人民代表大会制度理论创新研究”(批准号14ZDA014)的中期成果
关键词
宪法
法无授权不可为
权力并行列举法
学术规范
职业逻辑
Constitution
Absence of Legal Prohibition Means Freedom to State Organs
Method of Enumerating Power in Parallel
Academic Norms
Professional Logic