摘要
我国检察官惩戒委员会应当被定位为对检察官惩戒享有事实认定权的惩戒审议机构,具备专业性、合议性和审议范围有限性三个特征,承载着实现公正惩戒与履职保障的多重功能。检察官惩戒委员要发挥制度功能需要解决来自内外两方面的冲突:一个是监察体制改革的影响,一个是实践中试点探索对惩戒委员会功能定位的偏离。外部冲突需从理论梳理和有效衔接方面入手解决,内部冲突需要根据职能定位初衷从制度建构细节上予以矫正。
Prosecutors Disciplinary Committee in China should be identified as a professional review organizations having rights to identify facts for punishing procurators, which has three characteristics: professionalism, panel discussion and the lim- itation of the range of review. It assumes the responsibility of fair punishment and protection of the procurator's duties. It has to face two comflicts coming from outside and inside: one is from the supervision system reform, the other one is the deviation of pilot implementation from the main function of Prosecutors Disciplinary Committee. The comflict outside should be resolved by theoretical analysis and effective connection; the comflict inside should be resolved by correcting the defect details in the system construction based on functional orientation of Prosecutors Disciplinary Committee.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期93-101,共9页
Law Review
关键词
检察官惩戒委员会
司法责任
履职保障
专业性
合议性
审议范围的有限性
Prosecutors Disciplinary Committee
Judicial Responsibility
Protection of the Procurator's Duties
Profes- sionalism
Panel Discussion
the Limitation of the Range of Review