行政程序中间行为可诉性标准探讨--结合最高法院第69号指导案例的分析

The Standard of Litigability in the Intermediate Act of Administrative Procedure: Combined with the Analysis of Supreme Court Guiding Case No. 69

最高法院第69号指导案例形式上提出了行政程序中间行为可诉性的新标准,但该标准并未改变行政行为成熟性的可诉性规则,秉持的仍然是行政程序中间行为原则上不可诉,只有对相对人权利义务产生实际影响的才可以纳入行政诉讼范围。实践中纷繁复杂的行政程序中间行为实践样态,需要结合个案把握该指导案例的适用标准,特别是该指导案例裁判要旨中的"且"字只具有强调意味,不能被其字面逻辑所迷惑,如此才能准确发挥该案例的指导价值。而且,第69号指导案例的实践意义远不仅仅在于明晰行政行为成熟性和可诉性的标准,更深远的价值在于引发诉讼类型化的进一步思考。

The Supreme Court No. 69 Guiding Case formally proposed a new standard of litigability for intermediate act in administrative procedure, but the standard did not change the rule about ligitability, and it still holds the principle that the intermediate act of administrative procedure cannot be sued, Only the acts that have actual impact on the rights and obligations of the counterparty can be included in the scope of administrative litigation. In practice, practice patterns require the combination of cases to the complex administrative procedures intermediate grasp the applicable standards of the guiding case, especially the word ＂And＂ in the key points of guiding case, which only has a strong emphasis on mean- ing and we shouldn＇ t be fooled by its literal logic, Only in this way can we value of the case. Moreover, the practical significance of the No. 69 Guiding give Case full play to the guiding is much more than the standard of clarifying the maturity and the litigability of the administrative act. The more far-reaching val- ue lies in further thinking of the litigation type.