摘要
目的探讨急诊护理路径与传统护理对急性心肌梗死的抢救效果。方法选取2016年3月—2017年3月到某院急救中心进行治疗急性心肌梗死的患者148例,将148例患者随机分为两组,对照组患者使用传统护理方式对急诊护理患者进行抢救护理,实验组患者使用急诊护理模式对患者进行抢救护理。记录两组患者对护理的评价状况,调查护理满意度。结果实验组满意度87.84%,高于对照组75.68%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床急症对急性心肌梗死患者进行抢救时,可以使用急诊护理方式进行护理,护理满意度更高,对患者身体健康恢复有积极作用。
Objective To explore the effect of emergency nursing path and traditional nursing on acute myocardial infarction. Methods From March 2016 to March 2017, 148 patients with acute myocardial infarction Were treated in a hospital first aid center. 148 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional nursing methods to rescue the patients in the emergency nursing care. The patients in the experimental group were treated with emergency nursing care. The evaluation of nursing in two groups was recorded and the satisfaction of nursing was investigated. Results The degree of satisfaction in the experimental group was 87.84%, which was higher than that of the control group (75.68%), and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion When emergency rescue is carried out for patients with acute myocardial infarction, emergency nursing can be used for nursing, and the satisfaction degree of nursing is higher, which has a positive effect on the recovery of patients' health.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2018年第5期165-167,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
急诊护理路径
急性心肌梗死
满意度
emergency nursing path
acute myocardial infarction
satisfaction