期刊文献+

论风险导向审计发展创新 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过深入剖析现行具代表性的两种风险导向审计模的缺陷,从审计技术角度探索发展创新风险导向审计模式,切实提高独立审计师揭露管理舞弊的能力,以确保证券市场持续健康发展,重拾社会公众对审计职业信心。
作者 武竞杰
出处 《吉林农业(学术版)》 2010年第10期219-219,共1页
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1徐珊.经理股票期权及其会计问题研究:博士学位论文[M].厦门大学,2001,9..
  • 2Bell, T. B., S. Szykowny, and J. J. Willingham. 1991. Accessing the likelihood of fraudulent reporting: A cascaded logic approach. Working Paper, KPMG Peat Marwiek.
  • 3Boatsman, J.R. ,C. Moeckel, and B. K. W. Pei. 1997. The effects of decision consequences on auditors' reliance on decision aids in audit in audit planning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71:211-247.
  • 4Brian Patrick Green. Jae Hwa Choi. 1997. Assessing the risk of management fraud though neural network. Auditing 16- 14-28.
  • 5Calderon, T.G. and B. P. Green. 1994. Analysts' forecasts as exogenous risk indicator in analytical auditing . Advances in Accounting 12:281 - 300.
  • 6Eining, M.M. , D. R. Jones, and J. K. Loebbecke. 1997. Reliance on decision aids: An examination of auditors' assessment of management fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 16(Fall) : 1 - 19.
  • 7Hackenbrack, K. 1992. Implications of seemingly irrelevant evidence in audit judgment. Journal of Accounting Research(Spring) :54 - 76.
  • 8Albrecht, W.S. and M.B. Romney. 1986. Red- flagging management fraud: A validation. Advances in Accounting 3:323 - 334.
  • 9Hansen, J.V., J.B. McDonald, W.F. Messier, Jr. ,and T.B. Bell. 1996. A generalized qualitative- response model and the analysis of management fraud. Management Science 42:1022 -1032.
  • 10Hoffman, V. 13., K.P. Morgan, and J. M. Patton. 1995. Auditor' s perceptions of the relative diagnosticity of "red flag"fraud factors. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh.

共引文献155

同被引文献2

  • 1胡明兰.传统与现代风险导向审计的比较研究[J].财经观察,2008,(10).
  • 2王黎.现代风险导向审计浅析[J].财经纵横,2010.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部