期刊文献+

城市轨道交通高峰时段站间起讫点矩阵预测模型 被引量:8

Forecasting Model of Peak-Period Station-to-Station Origin-Destination Matrix in Urban Rail Transit Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高峰小时单向最大断面客流量是城市轨道交通规划与设计阶段的重要参考依据.为了确定这一参数,需对高峰时段内出发的乘客选择的出发时刻与路径进行预测.高峰时段站间起讫点(OD)矩阵反映了城市轨道交通乘客的出行需求,是整个预测的基础.在全天站间OD矩阵已知的前提下,以中国重庆市为研究对象,首先分析传统的重力模型在预测城市轨道交通高峰时段站间OD矩阵时的优、缺点,并在此基础上进一步提出站间客流高峰时段系数模型.比较结果表明,在同一数据源下,站间客流高峰时段系数模型能有效改善传统的重力模型所存在的缺陷,预测结果明显更优.该模型预测结果的标准误差为12.90人次,相较于重力模型的29.33人次降低了56.02%. Urban mass transit is playing a significant role in supporting and promoting urban development. An important indicator for the planning and design of urban rail transit may be succinctly summarized by passenger flow models within a peak hour; one important feature of the model is the maximum single-direction flow. To determine this feature, it is necessary to forecast passengers' departure time and route choice during a peak period. As the basis of this process, the peak-period station-to-station origin-destination (OD) matrix reflects passengers' travel needs. This paper tests the traditional gravity models to find the pattern that forecasts the peak-period station-to-station OD matrix in urban rail transit. A real-world case study of Chongqing, China, is used as a model performance measure. To alleviate its over-estimation when the effect of the deterrence function between two stations is too small, the gravity-model-based peak period coefficient (PPC) model is introduced. By comparing the PPC and gravity models using the same dataset, the results indicate that the PPC model is superior to the gravity model. The standard deviation of the PPC model is 12.90 passengers, which is 56.02% lower than that of the gravity model, which is 29.33 passengers.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期346-353,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 上海市自然科学基金(15ZR1443300)
关键词 城市轨道交通 站间客流 高峰时段系数 重力模型 交通阻抗函数 urban rail transit station-to-station ridership peak period coefficient gravity model deterrence function
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Bera S, Rao K K V . Estimation of origin destina- tion matrix from traffic counts: the state of the art [J]. European Transport, 2011, 49:3-23.
  • 2Shen W, Wynter L. A new one-level convex optimi- zation approach for estimating OD demand [J].Transportation Research Part B, 2012, 46 (10) : 1535-1555.
  • 3Zhou X S, Mahmassani H S. A structural state space model for real time traffic origin destination demand estimation and prediction in a day to daylearning framework [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2007, 41(8): 823- 840.
  • 4Zhou X S, Lu C C, Zhang K L. Dynamic origin-des- tination demand flow estimation under congested traffic conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2013, 34:16-37.
  • 5Parry K H M. Estimation of origin-destination ma- trices from link counts and sporadic routing data[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2012, 46(1): 75- 88.
  • 6David P W. Maximum likelihood estimation of an origin destination matrix from a partial registration plate survey[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1994, 28(4): 289-314.
  • 7Hazelton M L. Statistical inference for time varying origin destination matrices[J]. Transportation Re- search Part B, 2008, 42(6) : 542-552.
  • 8Perrakis K, Karlis D, Cools M, et al. A Bayesian approach for modeling origin-destination matrices [J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2012, 46(1) : 200-212.
  • 9Toledo T, Kolechkina T. Estimation of dynamic ori- gin-destination matrices using linear assignment ma- trix approximations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intel- ligent Transportation Systems, 2013, 14 (2) : 618- 626.
  • 10Lin P W, Chang G L. A generalized model and solu- tion algorithm for estimation of the dynamic freeway origin destination matrix[J]. Transportation Re- search Part B,2007, 41(5) :554-572.

共引文献4

同被引文献107

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部